[gore3000]

From the link:

"Pakicetids were the first cetaceans, and they are more primitive than other whales in most respects."

The proofs given in the way of bones in the article are:

The skulls of two pakicetid whales (Ichthyolestes on the left, Pakicetus on the right), flank the skull of a modern coyote.

and:
Photograph (above) of bones of Pakicetus (large animal) and Ichthyolestes (small animal)

Now that the "proof" is right here for all to see, perhaps you can explain to us how the above prove the evolution of whales from a coyote!

BTW - evos were trying to pass off the hippo as the ancestor of the whale, but they ran into a little trouble - DNA. The DNA proved conclusively that whales did not descend from hippos.

[mn12]

BTW - evos were trying to pass off the hippo as the ancestor of the whale, but they ran into a little trouble - DNA. The DNA proved conclusively that whales did not descend from hippos.

What, exactly, is the problem with correcting theories by gathering additional information?

BTW - many Christians were trying to pass off the Earth as being less than 10,000 years old, but they ran into a little trouble - radiometric data, scientific evidence from the solar system, and so forth.

[Junior]

Now that the "proof" is right here for all to see, perhaps you can explain to us how the above prove the evolution of whales from a coyote!

Did I call that one, or what? gore3000, I've got you figured out!