[gore3000]

Ask the fine folks who get paid lots of money to find and dig up petrochemical resources.

Not correct at all. Yes, certain fossils do indicate a high degree of likelihood of oil beneath. However, this is more in the realm of archaelogy, not evolution. It is just more evolution taking credit for something it has nothing to take credit for.

[VadeRetro]

Yes, certain fossils do indicate a high degree of likelihood of oil beneath. However, this is more in the realm of archaelogy, not evolution.

No, it isn't about archaelogy, or even archaeology. You don't know what the words mean.