[AndrewC]

Sometimes, you are very funny.

Thanks, I see you took it the right way. Off for a while.

[Nebullis]

I still think you are on the wrong track. You are trying to establish that there is no historical evidence for a particular origin of life theory in order to support your claim that without evidence, such theories constitute faith. There is enough scientific evidence to make certain theories plausible. But life arose, burned the book, and pulled up the ladder behind it. I doubt we'll ever have the historical evidence for the details about life's origins. But, speculations and theories (this field is rife with speculation), even if influenced by philosophy or faith, do not constitute faith. The historical evidence for origins may be beyond science, the evidence for plausibility is not, and this evidence is ever increasing.