I'm glad the wind has shifted the from earlier:
If the level of veracity displayed by the replica is anywhere near what you in general have been displaying, the original skull probably consisted of a tooth, a decayed one at that.
The wind shifts; a forward trench is abandonned for a rearward one. (Is that mixing the ol' metaphors or what?) But no mistep is acknowledged.

Evidently, this is not a replica. They used an inferior quality specimen to illustrate their point. Why?