Which is fine and understandable, but you elected to continue the discussion. A simple acknowledgement would have been sufficient, but you asked me if I had a grander point to make. My answer was to establish how sloppy you wished to be in your citations. You and others apparently don't care. Fine my point is made.
When you say that skull A is in better shape because it is a replica, you seek to imply to the gullible that skull A is another one of those Eee-vol-uu-shary Piltdowny Nebrasky Man frauds. Perhaps you'd like to read some of UCMP's self-serving evolushunist propaganda:
UCMP has the largest paleontological collection of any university museum in the world. These well-curated and computerized collections include fossil and modern organisms representing prokaryotes to vertebrates collected from all continents. The Museum serves the University community in various research projects and provides support for instruction at Berkeley and other UC campuses. In addition, the collections are used by paleontologists, biologists and geologists throughout the world.