A lot of assumptions here.
You're all so alike. You all chirp about the impossibility of "irreducible complexity" being the result of anything but a miracle. When a naturalistic scenario is presented (meaning that it is not and was never impossible), you instantly, with no acknowledgement of having said anything false, shift the grounds to "What's the proof of that?"
You said it was impossible. It isn't. Stop brazening all the time and be honest.