A better test is when science can no longer be disproven it has become a religion. The Evos here are always willing to modify the theory in light of new evidence. Indeed, it is easy to imagine evidence that would disprove evolution as currently formulated, such as fossils of humanoids that could be dated to more than 100 million years, or DNA results showing humans have more in common with trees than snakes. These results would call for major revisions in evolutionary theory.
However, the creationists will never admit of a fact that would disprove creation. It is hard to imagine what would disprove creationism - it is, in that respect, an untestable and empty idea, and is more religion than science.
That is the most rediculous thing I've ever heard on one of these threads. A 100 million yearold fossil of a human skeleton to disprove evolution? HELLO!
This is true of both. You are sadly in a state of denial. The only way to disprove creation is for it not to be true. I can't imagine how to disprove that 2+2=4 either. It is also impossible to disprove that God didn't just create me in the middle of typing this sentence. Science can only prove how things are now, not how they came to be.