The state is not able to discern when science becomes religion. When the state allows evolution to be taught and not creation or visa versa, they prove that. It has to either be both or neither. The state has not resolved the fallacy of induction either, yet it makes budgets as though the sun will rise tomorrow. I think the state is capable of drawing a few distinctions, and the one between "science" and evolution on the one hand and "religion" and creationism on the other is not a very subtle one.
The founding fathers knew a healthy religion would exist--succeed or fail on its own merits and only a sick religion-science would need to be tax--state supported. Evolution is breaking the establishment clause and restaint of trade---an illegal monopoly...it is the post office for dead mail--idiots(freak stamps)!