Not really; many if not most people never bother with links. I honestly think FR readers deserve to see what competent scientists (as opposed to your little clique or the t.o crew) actually think of evolutionism, and one or two quotes doesn't quite tell the story.
I understand why you hope this is true. Any short trip to Junior's links, the talk.origins archives, or any of the hundreds of ID/Creationist-debunking sites on the internet would quickly illustrate who is primarily engaged in the sham debate tactics you decry. Your only hope is to spam the threads and create the appearance of controversy where there is none.