Your quote is a complete misrepresentation of Gould's position.
So I said:
I defy you to falsify it by going back to the linked article and showing where he actually intended to say something else.
Quite a turn-around you attempted there. How dare I refute your and medved's misleading misquotes with a lengthy, accurate, in-context, and on-target citation from your favorite victim?
So anyway, I defied you and you clammed up. I still say that Gould has repudiated your abuse of him. Please show where he really meant to say you were right.