Like a good evolutionist, you do not post your "refutations" since you know they refute nothing.
Find a source yet for your claim that DNA evidence disproves a hippo-cetacean link?
What a silly dodge this link-phobia of yours is. What you don't want to see, no one can make you see. Here's the executive summary:
The creationist use of quotes is invalid and does not in any way provide evidence for creationism or against evolution. The reasons for this fall into several major categories: the use of quotations often is a fallacy of "argument from authority," selective quotation may be occurring, the quotations are often out-of-date, the quoted authorities are often not appropriate authorities, creationists are sometimes not honest in representing who the people they quote are, and that many of the quotations are misquotations.From Quotations and Misquotations: Why Creationist Quotes are Not Valid Evidence Against Evolution.