Replies

Dishonest? No, my assumption was the biblical truth that she was a sinner from birth. Only the heresy of pelagianism would deny this and that was dealt with nearly 2000 years ago. I had no need to inform you she lived normally for some time. That I had placed a trap for the pelagians such as yourself in no way makes me dishonest.

The question still remains: Since this woman was indeed a sinner, and since this woman had no ability to choose to accept Christ, how, according to arminian theology is she saved. According to arminian theology, -all- must decide for themselves -freely- to accept Christ. This woman could not ever have done so, in her normal life until she was 3 or in her brain damaged altered life for the next 47 years. How does the arminian reconcile this?

Do I need to note that I have yet to receive an answer other than that she was baptised? That answer contradicts the meaning of baptism anyway. And what about the vast number of arminians who deny the doctrine of infant baptism?

Jean