Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

— A Weapon to End War —
PBS (Tesla - His life and Legacy) ^ | FR Post 02-17-02 | Editorial Staff - PBS

Posted on 02/17/2002 8:33:04 AM PST by vannrox

A Weapon to End War




Tesla inherited from his father a deep hatred of war. Throughout his life, he sought a technological way to end warfare. He thought that war could be converted into, "a mere spectacle of machines."


In 1931 Tesla announced to reporters at a press conference that he was on the verge of discovering an entirely new source of energy. Asked to explain the nature of the power, he replied, "The idea first came upon me as a tremendous shock... I can only say at this time that it will come from an entirely new and unsuspected source."


War clouds were again darkening Europe. On 11 July 1934 the headline on the front page of the New York Times read, "TESLA, AT 78, BARES NEW 'DEATH BEAM.'" The article reported that the new invention "will send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 250 miles..." Tesla stated that the death beam would make war impossible by offering every country an "invisible Chinese wall."


The idea generated considerable interest and controversy. Tesla went immediately to J. P. Morgan, Jr. in search of financing to build a prototype of his invention. Morgan was unconvinced. Tesla also attempted to deal directly with Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain of Great Britain. But when Chamberlain resigned upon discovering that he had been out-maneuvered by Hitler at Munich, interest in Tesla's anti-war weapon eventually collapsed.


By 1937 it was clear that war would soon break out in Europe. Frustrated in his attempts to generate interest and financing for his "peace beam," he sent an elaborate technical paper, including diagrams, to a number of Allied nations including the United States, Canada, England, France, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia. Titled "New Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-Dispersive Energy Through Natural Media," the paper provided the first technical description of what is today called a charged particle beam weapon.


What set Tesla's proposal apart from the usual run of fantasy "death rays" was a unique vacuum chamber with one end open to the atmosphere. Tesla devised a unique vacuum seal by directing a high-velocity air stream at the tip of his gun to maintain "high vacua." The necessary pumping action would be accomplished with a large Tesla turbine.


Of all the countries to receive Tesla's proposal, the greatest interest came from the Soviet Union. In 1937 Tesla presented a plan to the Amtorg Trading Corporation, an alleged Soviet arms front in New York City. Two years later, in 1939, one stage of the plan was tested in the USSR and Tesla received a check for $25,000.


Tesla hoped that his invention would be used for purely defensive purposes, and thus would become an anti-war machine. His system required a series of power plants located along a country's coast that would scan the skies in search of enemy aircraft. Since the beam was projected in a straight line, it was only effective for about 200 miles — the distance of the curvature of the earth.


Tesla also contemplated peacetime applications for his particle beam, one being to transmit power without wires over long distances. Another radical notion he proposed was to heat up portions of the upper atmosphere to light the sky at night — a man-made aurora borealis.


Whether Tesla's idea was ever taken seriously is still a mater of conjecture. Most experts today consider his idea infeasible. Though, his death beam bears an uncanny resemblance to the charged-particle beam weapon developed by both the United States and the Soviet Union during the cold war.


Nonetheless, Tesla's dream for a technological means to end war seems as impossible now as it did when he proposed the idea in the 1930s.


One of the more controversial topics involving Nikola Tesla is what became of many of his technical and scientific papers after he died in 1943. Just before his death at the height of World War II, he claimed that he had perfected his so-called "death beam." So it was natural that the FBI and other U.S. Government agencies would be interested in any scientific ideas involving weaponry. Some were concerned that Tesla's papers might fall into the hands of the Axis powers or the Soviets.


The morning after the inventor's death, his nephew Sava Kosanovic´ hurried to his uncle's room at the Hotel New Yorker. He was an up-and-coming Yugoslav official with suspected connections to the communist party in his country. By the time he arrived, Tesla's body had already been removed, and Kosanovic´ suspected that someone had already gone through his uncle's effects. Technical papers were missing as well as a black notebook he knew Tesla kept—a notebook with several hundred pages, some of which were marked "Government."


P. E. Foxworth, assistant director of the New York FBI office, was called in to investigate. According to Foxworth, the government was "vitally interested" in preserving Tesla's papers. Two days after Tesla's death, representatives of the Office of Alien Property went to his room at the New Yorker Hotel and seized all his possessions.


Dr. John G. Trump, an electrical engineer with the National Defense Research Committee of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, was called in to analyze the Tesla papers in OAP custody. Following a three-day investigation, Dr. Trump concluded:


His [Tesla's] thoughts and efforts during at least the past 15 years were primarily of a speculative, philosophical, and somewhat promotional character often concerned with the production and wireless transmission of power; but did not include new, sound, workable principles or methods for realizing such results.


Just after World War II, there was a renewed interest in beam weapons. Copies of Tesla's papers on particle beam weaponry were sent to Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. An operation code-named "Project Nick" was heavily funded and placed under the command of Brigadier General L. C. Craigie to test the feasibility of Tesla's concept. Details of the experiments were never published, and the project was apparently discontinued. But something peculiar happened. The copies of Tesla's papers disappeared and nobody knows what happened to them.


In 1952, Tesla's remaining papers and possessions were released to Sava Kosanovic´ and returned to Belgrade, Yugoslavia where a museum was created in the inventor's honor. For many years, under Tito's communist regime, it was extremely difficult for Western journalists and scholars to gain access to the Tesla archive in Yugoslavia; even then they were allowed to see only selected papers. This was not the case for Soviet scientists who came in delegations during the 1950s. Concerns increased in 1960 when Soviet Premier Khrushchev announced to the Supreme Soviet that "a new and fantastic weapon was in the hatching stage."


Work on beam weapons also continued in the United States. In 1958 the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) initiated a top-secret project code-named "Seesaw" at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory to develop a charged-particle beam weapon. More than ten years and twenty-seven million dollars later, the project was abandoned "because of the projected high costs associated with implementation as well as the formidable technical problems associated with propagating a beam through very long ranges in the atmosphere." Scientists associated with the project had no knowledge of Tesla's papers.


In the late 1970s, there was fear that the Soviets may have achieved a technological breakthrough. Some U.S. defense analysts concluded that a large beam weapon facility was under construction near the Sino-Soviet border in Southern Russia.


The American response to this "technological surprise" was the Strategic Defense Initiative announced by President Ronald Reagan in 1983. Teams of government scientists were urged to "turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete."


Today, after a half-century of research and billions of dollars of investment, the SDI program is generally considered a failure, and there is still no realistic means of defense against a nuclear missile attack.


For many years scientists and researchers have sought for Tesla's missing papers with no apparent success. It is conceivable that if Nikola Tesla knew a means for accurately projecting lethal beams of energy through the atmosphere, he may have taken it to the grave with him.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: miltech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: George from New England
Didn't Tesla have something to do with the invention of the EMP bomb. The electro-magnetic pulse generator is partially due to the Tesla coil invention, right?

Can someone chip in on this.

The EMP bomb wouldn't necessarily end war, but it would end the American way of life. Nothing electronic would work anymore. We'd see the clock turned back 100 years in only a microsecond.

Tesla was certainly interested in something that disrupted electron flow through conductors, or enhanced that flow. Whether it was what we call EMP or not, or was something related is something else again.

But I imagine that anything that so interupted electrochemical activity would likely not be particularly good for living mammals, and might very well turn out to be something akin to a *death ray* if misused. And of course, the WWII efforts on the lines of *degaussing* the electromagnetic field as a counteractivity to enemy magnetic mines was also related.

-archy-/-

21 posted on 02/17/2002 1:59:55 PM PST by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
As someone involved with SDI, SDI is not a failure. It has suffered political fights where funding is cut, testing is not fully allowed, and deployment planning not authorized. The technologies work VERY well, and with support, they could be in place within the decade, if not sooner.

The Marxist author of this story just HATES Reagan and America, as all liberals do.

22 posted on 02/17/2002 2:22:03 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Ooops! Well, allow me to add another name to my panty-waist, cry-baby, "no-nukes" peaceniks.

Thanks bunches, OrthodoxPresbyterian.

23 posted on 02/17/2002 2:25:49 PM PST by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty, Libertarian_4_eva, Demidog
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian Ooops! Well, allow me to add another name to my panty-waist, cry-baby, "no-nukes" peaceniks. Thanks bunches, OrthodoxPresbyterian. 23 posted on 2/17/02 3:25 PM Pacific by Cyber Liberty

Nah. Many Libertarians like Nuclear Weapons... myself included.

Among the many funky proposals to come out of the Libertarian Party (and I do not count myself a Libertarian Party Man, but like all political parties, they have their funny days) was the proposal to dispose of all military forces except the Nuclear Missile Force.

See, main battle tanks can be used for aggressive war. Libertarians hate aggressive warfare.
Carrier Battle Groups be used for aggressive war. Libertarians hate aggressive warfare.
Strategic conventional bombers be used for aggressive war. Libertarians hate aggressive warfare.

All of these weapon systems can be used to destroy and then conquer. Libertarians HATE conquest; we are all about home, and hearth; family, friends, and property.

Nuclear Weapons, by contrast, are totally useless for aggressive warfare. They invalidate the "conquest" option, because there is nothing left to conquer once you fry the entire landscape for 10,000 years.

Why "conquer" that which you have Nuked? It's a waste of effort.

As a Defensive Weapon, Nuclear Weapons allow an Isolationist Republic to say:

For some libertarians (myself included), nuclear weapons are the ultimate libertarian Weapon. They are useless for aggressive conquest. And libertarians HATE aggressive conquest.

It's very Heinlein, mind you; but Heinlein was pretty libertarian.

We're not "anti-nuke". We're "anti-aggression". And Nukes DO deter aggression.

But they don't "prevent war". That's just silly.
Nuclear Weapons redirect War -- to somewhere else, than your own Home and Hearth.

And in a Fallen World, that's often the best you can hope for... to send the Wars somewhere else.
And, when Wars happen somewhere else (as they always will).... you leave them there.

24 posted on 02/17/2002 2:45:11 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
SDI worked Is there a USSR now ?

Another Person to check out is Kristian Birkeland.

Just finished a book on him “ The Northern Lights “ Lucy Jago 2001 ISBN 0-375-40980-7

Besides figuring out what the Northern lights were back in 1899 He also invented an “ Electromagnetic Cannon “ But like all true inventors he also had the “ Dark side “

25 posted on 02/17/2002 11:44:03 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson