Skip to comments.
America's laser of death cleared for take-off
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^
| 02/17/2002
| Sean Rayment
Posted on 02/16/2002 4:17:58 PM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-169 next last
To: piasa
You can use a "corner reflector" that directs the beam back to the original target no matter where it was aimed from. Different thickness and materials cam be used for different types of lasers and frequencies. Using vapor deposition, you can get very uniform surface coatings.
To: RadioAstronomer
A corner reflector. Now that's interesting, presumably something akin to reflectors used in some cameras and other optical equipment to see 'through the lens' when the eye isn't directly in line with it? Add another and you look at your own eye. How stupid of me not to think of that, particularly with my camara sitting right here by my computer. It would be a bummer to have a big laser foiled by a set of mirrors, or worse, turned back.
I'm still wondering about what would happen if a powerful laser hit a damaged mirror/reflector, though. I know people test lasers using well-made mirrors because the idea is to make the laser work- I'm just curious if anyone has tested a laser on a deliberately flawed mirror, since under field conditions a reflector might get damaged and be only partially reflective. If it loses too much of its reflective surface area, would it absorb the heat rather than reflect it, and possibly be damaged even more?
122
posted on
02/17/2002 12:32:19 AM PST
by
piasa
To: piasa
I am now wandering into the realm of speculation here. :) I have never been involved with laser mirror studies on the long term viability of defective or flawed mirrors. An optical physicist would be far more qualified to answer these questions. :)
To: piasa
YOUR POSITION SEEMS PLAUSIBLE, TO ME.
However, I don't have the luxury of thinking my relative was lying.
124
posted on
02/17/2002 1:20:02 AM PST
by
Quix
To: GOPJ
rattling sabers? Going public, anyway. I say that is akin to "serving notice."
My guess is that it's directed more at the American public and to congresscritters. It directly links to the Star Wars initiative and demonstrates the feasibility of that effort.
125
posted on
02/17/2002 3:27:23 AM PST
by
xzins
To: beowolf
Thank you Israel. Fruits of a good partnership.
To: Elsie
Fire=Laser beam....NOT
127
posted on
02/17/2002 4:47:35 AM PST
by
kanawa
To: Pokey78
!! BUMP a Great Thread !!
128
posted on
02/17/2002 7:53:06 AM PST
by
ez2muz
To: illstillbe
Pretty Bomber Plane.....that is a Death Star!
129
posted on
02/17/2002 8:06:19 AM PST
by
Dog
To: tet68
Son of Spectre
The Return of Puff
How About "POOF, the Magic Dragon"?
To: Ole Okie; one_particular-harbour
one_particular-harbour:
Do it with some hot actress in the Lincoln bedroom Ole Okie: X-42, the impeached Sick Willie Clitoon, has preceded you in this.
You've still got a shot - Babs doesn't qualify as hot...
131
posted on
02/17/2002 8:45:49 AM PST
by
LouD
To: DoughtyOne
an incredible amount of moral responsibility. Will these weapons always be used responsibly?
Only if the Commander in Chief is a moral, responsible human being.
Which I suppose requires the electorate to make moral, "informed" choices.
MI
To: beowolf
Do a Google search on 'THEL' laser
Actually, lookup COIL Laser instead
To: thud
A way out Ping!
To: Pokey78
From AFRL's Directed Energy Directorate, Laser Division, Cooperative Development Branch, Kirtland AFB NM
The following characteristics make the COIL a very
good candidate for high-power applications:
1 - near-infrared laser wavelength of 1.315 micrometers is great for transmission through optical fibers.
(You don't need to aim the entire devide, just the focusing head.)
2 - a high optical quality beam that can be focused to small spots for faster metal cutting
(as pinpoint as you want it to be)
3 - readily scaled to meet very high-power needs.
(as powerful as you want it to be)
4 - the by-products of COIL lasing are salt, water and oxygen; no greenhouse effect gases exist.
Cool - an eco-safe weapon. BWAHAHAHAHA
To: Pokey78
I don't believe all that talk of superweapons. Why didn't they already use them in Afghanistan?? I thought for sure they would implement their ways to eliminate those a-holes from using their radio communications on their shortwave transcievers, BUT NOOOOOOOOO! T.V. reports show the monkeys talking on their transceivers left and right. What's up with that?! I'm p*ssed that USA didn't do somthing to eliminate their crude radio communication "network". Even just dropping radios with like frequencies with transmission button taped "ON" would have worked.
To: My Identity
bump
Comment #138 Removed by Moderator
To: All
All this talk of laser weapons is old news. Back the in the early eighties my mom was moving out from the house I grew up in, and among the old newspapers was an L.A. Times from 1940 with the latest dispatches from the Battle of France. A small article had a story about Nazi soldiers with death rays mounted on their backpacks.
I can't believe the stuff we threw out!
To: Pokey78
Something tells me that SPF30 ain't gonna hack it.
140
posted on
02/17/2002 9:41:12 AM PST
by
stboz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson