Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff
"After reading "arguments" like that, I'm more dedicated than ever to wanting to keep my body private."

That's fine with me. I have absolutly no interest in her body, or what she does with it. But her right to privacy does not void another persons right to life, be it 6 months before birth or 6 months after birth.

121 posted on 02/16/2002 4:14:09 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
"After reading "arguments" like that, I'm more dedicated than ever to wanting to keep my body private."

"That's fine with me. I have absolutly no interest in her body, or what she does with it. But her right to privacy does not void another persons right to life, be it 6 months before birth or 6 months after birth "

Additionally, if she wants to "keep her body private" she ought to immediately drop any desire (which can be safely assumed) for public tax dollars in her "reproductive healthcare", or anyone else's, for that matter. As long as there is a solitary cent of public tax money finding it's way to the abortion practice, anyone who asserts a claim of "privacy" to shield the practice on that basis is, shall we say, unconvincing.

203 posted on 02/16/2002 10:05:50 AM PST by Mr. Bungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson