Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Car fire set off suspicions as crew fought it (Smith Tennesee License Scandal)
GoMemphis ^ | 15 Feb 2002 | By Bill Dries

Posted on 02/15/2002 1:35:24 PM PST by weegee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: JackelopeBreeder
Sounds like Willey Pete -- white phosphorus.

When they detect THE OBVIOUS PRESCENCE of gasoline?

C'mon ...

21 posted on 02/15/2002 2:33:14 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Perhaps the contraption intended to blow up the gas tank too,

Yeah, right.

Maybe in the movies ...

22 posted on 02/15/2002 2:34:18 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Ok........so they would have seen another car in the area....

This had to be something planted in the car.....under the backseat....or dashboard set off by remote control...

23 posted on 02/15/2002 2:34:20 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Somebody went to a lot of trouble to make it "look" like an accident

Geez ... NO!

It was RATHER OBVIOUS even to the FIRE FIGHTERS.

24 posted on 02/15/2002 2:35:31 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: null and void
There were six witnesses (related, so their may have been travelling in the same car).

They observed the car fire before impact. They should be concerned about their well-being at this point in time and consider leaving the area for awhile.

Whoever did this is still loose (Middle Eastern terrorist, Dixie Mafia, etc.).

I think that it's obvious that Ms. Smith underestimated how dangerous the people she'd delt with were. This could be the work of a past client but so far Odtllah is the only client we know of (and he was still mediator in this transaction).

One of the men's lawyers suggested that Ms. Smith must have led a double life and that is what brought this about, not the current case she was about to testify on.

25 posted on 02/15/2002 2:35:47 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Spontaneous corruption...
26 posted on 02/15/2002 2:36:30 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Freebasing?
27 posted on 02/15/2002 2:36:37 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
OK, the contraption was clearly intended to spare the gas tank.
28 posted on 02/15/2002 2:37:07 PM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dog
This had to be something planted in the car.....under the backseat....or dashboard set off by remote control...

Don't ya think there would be REMAINS of something if that were the case?

That aspect is rather easy to put to rest.

29 posted on 02/15/2002 2:38:05 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
OK, I was deliberately designed to look like arson-murder...
30 posted on 02/15/2002 2:38:43 PM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: null and void
OK, the contraption was clearly intended to spare the gas tank.

CLEARLY null and void thinking ... NO!

That is normally INSUFFICIENT in to ignite a gas tank -

- I see you too willfully CHOOSE to ignore EXTREMELY OBVIOUS evidence of a torching ...

31 posted on 02/15/2002 2:40:29 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Looks like a duck......walks like a duck....quacks like a duck.....I guess it isn't a duck huh...?
32 posted on 02/15/2002 2:40:47 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
OK, they'll never find any remains of a device.

Nothing to see here, if you'd only not bother to look, move along...

33 posted on 02/15/2002 2:40:55 PM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dog; weegee;Wright is Right;Shermy;illstillbe
Okay. some questions and a theory. (tinfoil time?)

She bought/was buying the car from Otondah(sp?).

Did she drive the car before early Sunday morning after getting out of jail? She was out for 1 week prior to the hit. What happened to the car during that time? Where was it parked? Who had access to it?

Did the ME guys have a tip that they were going to be arrested?

What did the neighbors of this woman's family (if any, I don't know how rural her family's house is) see on Saturday? Was the house/car unattended for some part of the day?

Or was the device already planted before he sold the car to her with a remote activation of some type already installed? Did the arrest simply force someone's hand? Was the hit pre-planned to get rid of her and the arrests are the only reason this wasn't classified as a regular accident? And, if this is so, does it mean that there are independent cells at work? In other words, the order to get rid of her may have come before they were arrested - could have been transmitted by one of the 5 in custody when they thought they would get the licenses with no way to recall the order once issued?

34 posted on 02/15/2002 2:41:33 PM PST by testforecho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void
OK, I[t] was deliberately designed to look like arson-murder...

It was designed to be an arson/murder - to the trained eye and trained fire-fighters it OBVIOUSLY looks/looked that way too ...

35 posted on 02/15/2002 2:42:22 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
So what is your theory???

You have all the answer's ....enlighten us..

36 posted on 02/15/2002 2:42:24 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JackelopeBreeder
Doesn't WP leave an oxide residue?
37 posted on 02/15/2002 2:42:31 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Flamethrower?
38 posted on 02/15/2002 2:43:55 PM PST by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog
"This had to be something planted in the car.....under the backseat....or dashboard set off by remote control..."

Probably so. But Ms. Smith had to already be unconscious. She was doused with gasoline, remember, so that she couldn't have been driving. Thus, somebody else had to get the car started and moving.

39 posted on 02/15/2002 2:44:31 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: testforecho
Or was the device already planted before he sold the car to her with a remote activation of some type already installed?

AGAIN, there will be charred REMAINS of some 'device' ...

I guess you people don't "burn your own trash" anymore -

- or you'd have a better idea of WHAT is LEFT after an attempt at incineration ...

40 posted on 02/15/2002 2:44:46 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson