A principle of self centered naïveté. The L's would just soon protect the rights of a "pedophile" as to protect the rights of parents and their children.
That's manure. Read the article again. The action the LP took in this case has exactly the opposite effect.
Don't presume to tell me what I would "just soon do".
There is no such thing a right to pedophilia, so your statement is foolish. Furthermore, even a pedophile has Constitutional rights that are currently protected by force of law. Are you opposed to that?