Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OBAFGKM
The point is: Facts are not "probably", even in science. How could you miss my point?
13 posted on 02/14/2002 9:36:43 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: fish hawk
"Facts are not "probably", even in science."

Actually, you mean "probably" is not fact, but even so, Dr. Makovicky doesn't present the statement as fact. However, he does hypothesize that S. changii had feathers. He does so because it is apparently closely related to creatures that demonstrably had feathers.

15 posted on 02/14/2002 10:10:20 AM PST by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson