Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child-Free and Carefree
ABC News ^ | February 14, 2002 | Geraldine Sealey

Posted on 02/14/2002 7:09:10 AM PST by Artie_Kay

When Ellen Metter was a young girl, she didn't go for the baby-doll thing. She dressed her Barbie up as Mary Tyler Moore — a single, urban professional with her own imaginary apartment and fun date nights."She was hip," says Metter, author of the recent humor book Cheerfully Childless. Now Metter, 42, wonders if her young lack of interest in nurturing dolls foreshadowed her adult lack of desire to have children.

Like many women who decide against children, Metter says she questioned her leanings on occasion — either through her own self-exploration or others' prodding questions. When she met her boyfriend a few years ago, she thought she wanted to have kids with him because it seemed like the ultimate expression of their love. But the couple eventually decided against it.

"My boyfriend has great genes, he's handsome, we'd make an adorable child," Metter says. "But then again, Hitler had parents."

Humor has helped Metter communicate with others about a topic she says is misunderstood by a family-oriented culture. "It's not right for me," Metter says. "And if you're like me and never had this visceral attraction to kids then it's probably not right for you either."

Indeed, more people are deciding kids are not for them as the ranks of the childless continue to swell.

Although a government report released this week showed American women having more children than at any time in the last 30 years — in many cases, a good economy made it easier for women to have additional children — more women are also postponing childbearing or foregoing it all together.

Of women ages 40 to 44 years old, near the end of their childbearing years, 19 percent are childless, the U.S. Census Bureau reports — a number almost twice as high as 20 years earlier.

While those statistics include women who would like to have kids or are infertile, more women say they're childless by choice. Nearly 7 million women of childbearing age defined themselves as voluntarily childless in 1995, the latest year available, up from 2.4 in 1982, according to the National Center of Health Statistics.

Shunned and Misunderstood

It's no coincidence that voluntary childlessness is on the rise as women are becoming more educated and eligible for a wide variety of opportunities outside of family life, says Madelyn Cain, author of the book The Childless Revolution.

Childless couples tend to be a more educated and affluent group than their counterparts with kids. With no child-related expenses to shell out, childless couples have more disposable income to spend — 60 percent more on entertainment, 79 percent more on food and 101 percent more on dining out than parents, according to American Demographics magazine.

Despite their growing numbers, many childless individuals and couples complain that they are ignored as a legitimate interest group and consumer class and even shunned by society for their lifestyles.

"We are with childlessness where we were with homosexuality 20 years ago," Cain says. "We always talk about family-friendly America. It is always part and parcel of a politician's package. But the package they're selling doesn't match the general public."

Those who are childless say they get all sorts of unwelcome, and unfair, observations from strangers, family, friends, and co-workers alike. They're told they are: Self-centered, deviant, workaholic, immature, and child-haters.

In reality, Cain said, the reasons people are childless are varied and complex: Some have environmental, religious, medical or professional reasons. For others, it's a matter of happenstance — they didn't meet the right partner or the time just never seemed right.

Child-Free: More Selfless Than Parenting?

Some particularly rabid Web sites devoted to the "child-free," as many like to be called, refer to parents as "breeders" and condemn procreation in general, but they seem to be in a vocal minority. Most who are childless by choice say they respect parents and enjoy children. They just know parenting is not for them.

A lack of understanding about the choice to be childless can be annoying when it comes from acquaintances, and downright devastating when it comes from loved ones, Cain said.

"When your mother says, 'You're gonna regret it,' if that doesn't send a chill through you or wake you in the middle of the night …" says Cain, who interviewed 125 childless women for her book. "Those are terrible things to hold over someone's head."

Lisa Casablanca Simmons, 36, knows what it's like to be poked with questions about the choice she made as a teenager not to have children. Married for 14 years, Simmons said her husband's family first thought she was selfish.

But Simmons sees her decision as rooted in not just honest self-assessment — she thinks she would make a "terrible mom" because she's not very patient — but also selflessness.

"Isn't it selfish to bring an unwanted child into this world?" says Simmons, who lives in Los Angeles. "We're doing right by not bringing an unwanted child into the world."

Finding a Substitute for the PTA

For Kathleen Sartoris, 32, of Queens, N.Y., choosing not to have children also was part of an honest, and in her view necessary, prioritizing of her life.

"I am sure I will miss out if I never have kids, but I know I will miss out on other things if I do," said Sartoris. "It's a tradeoff."

Sartoris and her husband of 10 years travel for work and pleasure, are going back to school, and spend time volunteering. Unlike their friends who have children, Sartoris and her husband also have the freedom to pick up new hobbies and activities and not feel guilty or time-strapped, she said.

"If you have children, you have to consider your child," Sartoris said. "The idea that you can do it all and have it all is a real misconception."

The growing popularity of an international social network for childless individuals and couples, called No Kidding, is further evidence of the increased visibility of the "child-free." No Kidding now has 71 chapters and has a convention set for next month in Las Vegas.

What No Kidding provides is the kind of social networking that many parents find in activities centered on their children, members say.

"PTA, school sports, carpooling. For adults who have children, the children have a huge social network, and are usually a starting point for meeting other adults," says Mitch Greenberg, 41, who organizes events for a Maryland chapter of No Kidding.

The child-free social group fills a social void for nonparents, he said, and helps replace friends who may have lost touch because parenting consumes their time.

At some point, friends who once had many things in common find themselves alienated from one another — even if reluctantly — when they choose different paths when it comes to childbearing. "Those who we lose contact with are usually the people who have children," says Greenberg, who has been married for 15 years. "You no longer have things in common, and they're usually not available to do things," he said.

Along with social isolation, some childless people claim that our family-centered culture can be unfair to them. Some childless workers complain of having to pick up the slack for working parents, or say they are more likely to be expected to work longer hours or weekends.

What's Fair for the Child-Free?

Other complaints from nonparents include watered-down group health insurance packages to compensate for others' young dependents, or the myriad benefits such as unpaid leave, child tax credits or greater 401(k) contributions that are reserved for parents.

Of course, working parents also have complaints about how they're treated in the workplace, and Cain doesn't deny that government and corporate policies can punish both parents and nonparents for the choices they've made.

Parents and nonparents need to start communicating with one another about what is fair, Cain said. Working parents should be able to leave the job if their child is sick, Cain said, but so should childless workers have opportunities to take personal time away for themselves as well.

A compromise could be for companies to offer "personal hours" away from work instead of entire days, so workers could use their hours to fill their personal or family needs without leaving for an entire day, Cain suggests.

But Cain, who has a 16-year-old daughter, born when she was almost 40 years old, said her greatest hope is for people with and without children to understand and accept one another and their lifestyle choices.

"It could have been that I didn't have a child, would it have made me a lesser being? I hope not," Cain said. "Each woman's life should be valued as important for the choices she makes."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-308 last
To: Quester
You are right . . .I was wrong . . .
301 posted on 02/18/2002 8:34:02 AM PST by mamaduck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: constitutiongirl;Capt.YankeeMike
Well said, girl. My kids look about as anglo as any kid you'd ever want to see. However, when it comes out to filling out any paperwork at school, I tell them that they need to fill in the Hispanic block (my wife's Hispanic). Sorry, but that's the way the game is played today.

All those Yankees don't understand that down here in Texas, the Hispanic vote is trending more conservative every year, and it's scaring the hell out of the Democrat party. I see that with my own in-laws. Many of them (and its one of those BIG Hispanic families) never would've voted for a Republican ten years ago. Now that they've seen what the real world is like, and see where their money goes in taxes, they're more open to hearing what Republicans and conservatives have to say. They always were socially conservative and pro-life, but they've taken that next step in asserting themselves.

Except for the city of Dallas, and maybe Fort Worth, the Democrat party no longer exists as a political entity in the Metroplex.

There are great arguments on both sides regarding childbearing vs. childless. I only know that for myself, being a father has been the best thing that ever happened to me. My two kids drive me crazy, especially now that they're of the teenage persuasion, but I wouldn't trade them for anything!

Sorry, Capt.Mike, but there's one more Hispanic kid entering the world this week, not later than Friday morning: my second son! We haven't decided on a name yet, but if it is this Friday, his nickname will be 'Deuce', in honor of his birthdate, 2-22-2002.

In light of my advanced age (47), I have removed the word 'retirement' from all of my dictionaries and spell-checkers! Maybe I'll 'get it right' this time around!

302 posted on 02/18/2002 9:02:03 AM PST by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Quester
sorry: except none of the above would have considered themselves "Child-Free and Carefree", nor do "career womyn" equate with Jesus or Mother Theresa . . .
303 posted on 02/18/2002 2:28:06 PM PST by mamaduck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Congrats on the new little boy. Ironically (or not), my father is a stauch conservative. I have one Cuban cousin who is a Libertarian and the rest of my Cuban family are either Republicans or Constitution Party members. My mother's family is rife with Socialists and liberals. The ones in Belfast vote Labour and the ones here (including Mom) vote Democrat.
304 posted on 02/18/2002 2:55:31 PM PST by constitutiongirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Artie_Kay
Indeed. And many here on this forum stand up and loudly comment on the fact that latinos are taking over. Well, now we can see why. Here is the undisguised fact: caucasian women in the US in the past 30 years have turned completely around in their worldview regarding children. The feminists did their job effectively - nowadays the white woman who really wants and desires to have a children just for the sake of building a family with her husband is rare indeed.

This is not the case with latinas. Their WHOLE culture revolves around the family as the bedrock foundation. And that is why their culture is expanding and growing.

Sure there are extremes on both ends of the spectrum. But when I look at a mixed latino family with four kids, who give up luxuries and 'entertainment' for the simple blessings of raising a baby - and compare them with a RINO rich white couple who've got no kids and money to burn.....I know who is going to inherit the future.

305 posted on 02/18/2002 3:08:21 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capt.YankeeMike
And the Anglos only have themselves to blame. Caucasians - men and women, bought the feminist and new-age creeds hook, line and sinker. So they turned to wealth, entertainment, and stock options to bring them joy instead of the blessing of bringing up a baby and building families.

The bottom line is this: Caucasians turned their back on building families. Latinos did not. It's not hard to figure out which culture is going to expand.

(BTW your numbers are not only wrong, but not even close to being right.)

306 posted on 02/18/2002 3:15:13 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: constitutiongirl
No kidding! Evidently the Capt forgot to look back and see that CAUCASIAN families 50-60 years ago regularly had 5 or more kids each. My dad had 7 brothers and sisters. My mom had 8.

The fact of the matter is that whites (except for some who are religious) by and large have turned their backs on building families. They turned a long time ago to their stocks, homes, and entertainment to give them joy. It is getting harder and harder to even find a Caucasian women who desires to raise a family.

Fortunately this not the case with Latinas.

307 posted on 02/18/2002 3:20:11 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: WarEagle

Its not a sin agains’t God to not have children. Everyone is different. If you don’t want kids don’t have them its a big responsibility and you wouldn’t want to mess it up. I always knew I would be terrible at it. I am however a fantastic Aunt to 3 kids. I just can’t do it full time.


308 posted on 07/07/2014 2:42:26 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-308 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson