[summer]

revise the test.

I understand your point, Sgt. Schultze, but know there ARE diffferences in the quality of tests. A 'good' test, for example, is designed to be aligned with the objectives that have been communicated and taught. And, clearly communicating learning objectives -- as well as providing materials pertaining to those objectives -- are two areas where I think school districts often fail teachers, making teachers' jobs harder.

But I agree with you -- there is no need to "dumb" down testing. The real need is to get all the pieces in place and on the table -- learning objectives, materials to teachers, teachers who can teach and motivate, and tests related to the stated objectives.

Thanks for your post. BTW, I like your screen name! :)

[Sgt_Schultze]

I think I agree with you, but... In Maryland, that test has been used for the last 8 years or so. It had been touted as a model for the nation. Scores were rising - until last year. This year they have fallen again, prompting the cries to "recalibrate" the test.

Thanks for the compliments on the name. I am preparing for my congressional testimony ... I know nothiiing!