Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Plans Unprecedented Camera Network
REUTERS ^ | February 13, 2002 08:10 AM ET | Reuters

Posted on 02/13/2002 6:15:46 AM PST by goldylight

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Washington police are building what will be the nation's biggest network of surveillance cameras to monitor shopping areas, streets, monuments and other public places in the U.S. capital, a move that worries civil liberties groups, The Wall Street Journal said on Wednesday.

The system would eventually include hundreds of cameras, linking existing devices in Metro mass transit stations, public schools and traffic intersections to new digital cameras mounted to watch over neighborhoods and shopping districts, the Journal said.

"In the context of Sept. 11, we have no choice but to accept greater use of this technology," Stephen Gaffigan, the head of the police department project, told the Journal.

He said city officials had studied the British surveillance system, which has more than 2 million cameras throughout the country, and were "intrigued by that model."

One of the first uses of police surveillance cameras in Washington was April 2000, when authorities set up a network to monitor protests during a meeting of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, the newspaper said.

On Tuesday morning, in response to the latest terror alert issued by the Justice Department, police activated a $7 million command center that was first used on Sept. 11. The command center, which has dozens of video stations for monitoring cameras, will remain in use until federal officials end the alert, the Journal reported.

Cameras installed by the police have been programmed to scan public areas automatically, and officers can take over manual control if they want to examine something more closely.

The system currently does not permit an automated match between a face in the crowd and a computerized photo of a suspect, the Journal said. Gaffigan said officials were looking at the technology but had not decided whether to use it.

Eventually, images will be viewable on computers already installed in most of the city's 1,000 squad cars, the Journal said.

The Journal said the plans for Washington went far beyond what was in use in other U.S. cities, a development that worries civil liberties advocates.

Barry Steinhardt, associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union in New York, noted there were few legal restrictions of video surveillance of public streets. But he said that by setting up a "central point of surveillance," it becomes likely that "the cameras will be more frequently used and more frequently abused."

"You are building in a surveillance infrastructure, and how it's used now is not likely how it's going to be used two years from now or five years from now," he told the Journal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billofrights; biometrics; privacylist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last
To: Rebelbase
Orson Wells was a prophet.

No. It was his time machine.
I'm gonna brush up on my reading!!!

21 posted on 02/13/2002 6:26:26 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; callisto;michaelje;NC_Libertarian;goldylight
Terrorist, terrorist, terrorist, terrorist, terrorist.

Each one of you are just trying to scare the rest of us with these so called incursions into our supposed freedoms. John Ashcroft said that what you guys are pointing out are just "phantoms of lost liberty". So he must be right. He also said that people like you just aid the terrorists. So "J'accuse". You are all terrorists.

22 posted on 02/13/2002 6:27:06 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
"He said city officials had studied the British surveillance system, which has more than 2 million cameras throughout the country, and were "intrigued by that model." "

The Prisoner.

23 posted on 02/13/2002 6:27:20 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
city officials had studied the British surveillance system, which has more than 2 million cameras throughout the country, and were "intrigued by that model.

When I visited England I saw these cameras and I was proud that I lived in a country that would never do such a thing.

I'm not so proud anymore.

24 posted on 02/13/2002 6:27:37 AM PST by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Our ability to fight our own govt like the Revolutionary war is gone. Sad truth.
25 posted on 02/13/2002 6:27:42 AM PST by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: callisto
I don't want to hear anything you have to say. You are a terrorist. John Ashcroft said so.

You should be locked up.

26 posted on 02/13/2002 6:28:41 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: boris
It won't work. First, most of the cameras will be undetectable. Second, in most cases cameras will be in the view of other cameras. Anyone showing too much interest in the cameras will be suspected as a possible terrorist or thief planning an operation or heist.

Get your head right. You must learn to love Big Brother, Winston.

27 posted on 02/13/2002 6:28:51 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: callisto
My concern lies in the future use of these anti-terrorist tools by another administration who may not be so friendly to those who disagree with them.

Waco, Ruby Ridge.....

28 posted on 02/13/2002 6:29:30 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
When the dome was reconstucted a couple of years ago, my guess was that cameras were installed in 360 degrees around the dome at that time. Anyone want to guess this did NOT happen?
29 posted on 02/13/2002 6:30:02 AM PST by nsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
"we have no choice but to accept greater use of this technology"

How about enforcing the laws that are already on teh books that do not need this technology? It seems the natural desire of people with little to do is to migrate to 1984.

30 posted on 02/13/2002 6:30:03 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smith288
Oh, so you want to start a revolution eh. Terrorist! I denounce you! Consider yourself reported.
31 posted on 02/13/2002 6:30:07 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: boston_liberty
The sheeple in DC will welcome the cameras with open arms.

BAAAAA BAAAAAAAA BLEEEEEEET

32 posted on 02/13/2002 6:30:09 AM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
Allow me to post the obligatory, inane, asinine, default statemet that is sure to pop up here from the idiots who can't see past their statist schnozolas.

If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about!

There, saved ya'll the trouble.

33 posted on 02/13/2002 6:30:37 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
Do you have anything to add to this thread other than we are all terrorists for having concern over the possible loss of liberties and freedom bequeathed us from the Founders of nation? :)
34 posted on 02/13/2002 6:31:29 AM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

35 posted on 02/13/2002 6:32:07 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
we already have the unending, unwinnable war started.. the war against terror. What more could "1984" have asked for than this war?

When the "War on Drugs" was growing unpopular, I noticed that the word "terror" was becoming more popular.. soon, we were after "narco-terrrorists" and now we have the ultimate: The war on terror.

36 posted on 02/13/2002 6:32:29 AM PST by nsmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tex-oma; riley1992
It's just keeps getting better and better.
37 posted on 02/13/2002 6:33:54 AM PST by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
"In the context of Sept. 11, we have no choice but to accept greater use of this technology," Stephen Gaffigan, the head of the police department project, told the Journal.

Not only is he installing a Big Brother network, he's going to tell us how to feel about it.

Such galling presumption for a servant of the public. Methinks he doesn't know his proper place.

38 posted on 02/13/2002 6:35:07 AM PST by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
What you are conspiring about is just "Phantoms of lost liberties" not real. This adminstration would NEVER allow anything to happen that could harm our freedom. Freedom and Liberty! That's what we're having the Northern Alliance and all sorts of indigenous revolutionaries in Iraq, Iran and North Korea fight for. If you can't see that, it is obvious that you are just some kind of trouble maker. A terrorist yourself. You probably deserve twenty years in jail.
39 posted on 02/13/2002 6:35:16 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: callisto
You are guilty of thought crime. Report to the re-education center immediatly!
40 posted on 02/13/2002 6:35:33 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson