Replies

The question then seems to be whether irresponsible parents (being defined as those whose decisions can put their children's lives at risk) should have their children taken from them.

This needs to be decided on a case by case basis. Children have extreme loyalty to parents...even abusive or neglective parents. Children feel terrible anxiety over separation from their parents. When I was younger I would have said automatically, that they should be removed. Now, having atained a bit more maturity I would try to evaluate whether the parents can be persuaded or taught to be more nuturing or protective.

Now, should parents who because of their religious beliefs will not provide medical assistance to their children when they are ill, have their kids taken from them?

Again, this needs to be evaluated on a case by case basis, rather than an across the board ruling. One of the functions of civil government is to protect every citizen, be they adult or child.

While I personally believe in divine healing, I would seek to ensure that the child lives. This might involve court ordered medical visits and monitoring of the child's environment. As a LAST resort, to protect the integrity of the child's emotional well being, I would have the child removed from the home if the parents REFUSED to follow court orders for medical treatment.

Any other questions?