Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sandlady, JAM
"he would have been attacked by them for causing a disturbance and disobeying the orders of flight and challenging the flight staff."

Ummm, hate to break it to you two, but that's exactly what Todd Beamer, et al DID. It occurs to me that smart hijackers now will not announce themselves as hijackers, but rather pretend to be US Air Marshalls, and then sheeple passengers such as yourselves will meekly do whatever they're told.

174 posted on 02/12/2002 5:35:02 AM PST by rdww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: rdww
"he would have been attacked by them for causing a disturbance and disobeying the orders of flight and challenging the flight staff."

Ummm, hate to break it to you two, but that's exactly what Todd Beamer, et al DID. It occurs to me that smart hijackers now will not announce themselves as hijackers, but rather pretend to be US Air Marshalls, and then sheeple passengers such as yourselves will meekly do whatever they're told.

I would say the latter group was acting in self defense and your man was acting from selfish arrogance. If he had a bowel problem, he needed to tell the flight attendant instead of giving her a one-minute staredown. Contrary to your belief, I consider the air crews to be the good guys just trying to keep their throats intact.

177 posted on 02/12/2002 6:00:19 AM PST by sandlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson