Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran missile trial fails, casualties reported
Ha'aretz ^ | Ffebruary 10.2002 | By Ze'ev Schiff

Posted on 02/09/2002 7:35:52 PM PST by Rain-maker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: RichInOC
lol
42 posted on 02/09/2002 8:34:37 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: imam
what the hell does islam have to do with some country making missiles? does the fact that america has wepons of mass destruction tarnish cristianity?

We, unlike islam, have the common sense not to use them. We've had the bomb for close to 60 years and never used it except to finish off the last World War.

Pakistan got it and all of a sudden they come close to two all out regional nuclear wars with India inside of 3 years.

Iraq is drooling to send jihad atoms to Israel and Iran is trying to ship a bunch of palestinian monkey boys weapons and a nuke if they could.

Islam can build the weapons, but since most islamic societies are stuck in the 12th century (or earlier) ... we'll just take them from you when you do manage to make one.

43 posted on 02/09/2002 8:35:34 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: imam
does the fact that america has wepons of mass destruction tarnish cristianity?

No. Might tarnish the living $hit out of Tehran one day though...

44 posted on 02/09/2002 8:36:46 PM PST by apastron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
Experts say the repeated failures in the engines of the ground-to-ground missile will undoubtedly delay its production

Ok .. stupid question here .. but what the heck is a Ground to Ground missile???

45 posted on 02/09/2002 8:38:18 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
Hope they don't believe in trying again until they succeed.
46 posted on 02/09/2002 8:39:17 PM PST by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rack42
Thank you for those coherent, well thought-out opinions. You should be on NPR.
47 posted on 02/09/2002 8:39:25 PM PST by Mentos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mentos
Iran missile trial fails, casualties reported

who's there secetary of defense Wily-E-Coyote :)

48 posted on 02/09/2002 8:44:43 PM PST by MetalHeadConservative35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rack42
You Sir are an idiot.
49 posted on 02/09/2002 8:45:12 PM PST by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
How much do you want to bet that the "failure" had a little help from our friends...
50 posted on 02/09/2002 8:47:30 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
And he would want a Nobel peace prize for being such a good friend to the Iranians.
51 posted on 02/09/2002 8:48:29 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
The Shihab-3 may not go into production at all--the production and testing of the prototypes could be merely an interim phase in Iran's ongoing development of the Shihab-4, which will have a range of about 2000 km and larger payload capacity. Unlike its predecessor, the Shihab-4 is the product of exclusively Russian ballistic technology and can carry biological, chemical or nuclear warheads (it's ostensible purpose is to launch satellites into orbit). Development of the Shihab-4 is expected to be completed within 2-3 years. Experts have also estimated that Iran will develop a long-range ballistic missile, the Shihab-5, capable of reaching targets in the United States, by 2010.
52 posted on 02/09/2002 8:52:23 PM PST by AmerRepb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lent
That blowed up REAL good!

Thanks for the laugh--I had the best image of the late John Candy in his Canuck garb saying that!

53 posted on 02/09/2002 8:52:25 PM PST by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
The die is cast. President Reagan and his administration had the prescience to see what would inevitably happen in the progression of technology. Computers make it possible for every nation intent upon harnessing the seductive lure of ICBM technology to eventually possess missiles capable of piercing the atmosphere.

Does the west have the meansand the will to once again render it's poorly copied technologied by the east obsolete?

54 posted on 02/09/2002 9:03:17 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apastron
Hummmmmm ??.......no daylight cover on yer PVS-4 is really gonna piss off yer Armorer if ya turn it on........

Good pic anyway :o) Stay Safe !

55 posted on 02/09/2002 9:04:26 PM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
I don't know how they can say this was a failure? The missle blew up didn't it? So, I guess it was successful after all. Hehehehe.
56 posted on 02/09/2002 9:07:14 PM PST by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
Rack is not so much an idiot as he/she is an ignoramus. There is a difference, one the function of bad genetic luck, the other the failure to learn or be taught.
57 posted on 02/09/2002 9:07:55 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Rain-maker
Couldn't have happened to a nicer country. Well.. maybe Iraq, or Syria, or...
58 posted on 02/09/2002 9:10:47 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"Ok .. stupid question here .. but what the heck is a Ground to Ground missile???"

Missle fired from the ground to a target on the ground. Air to air missle is one fired by an aircraft at another aircraft. Then you have ground to air... air to ground... okay? :)

59 posted on 02/09/2002 9:13:29 PM PST by cibco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: exit82
I had the best image of the late John Candy in his Canuck garb saying that!

Now you have another one. (Not sure what he's saying though...)


60 posted on 02/09/2002 9:15:41 PM PST by apastron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson