Replies

I choose to ignore your rudeness just this once, and respond.

antivenom said:
..BTW he never risked shit...he was basically GIVEN $100.000.00 in stock for FAVORS. We will soon learn of his favors...BUT get one thing straight HE DID NOT write a check to anyone for $100,000.00 to gamble legally in the stock market for THIS "GROSS" (as in disgusting) gain.

YOU asked for proof that TM "didn't risk $hit", (in your usual rude manner):
If there is proof of the accusations you make, then there is reason to look for some sort of action.
Absent any proof, your accusations are baseless and reflect a lack of understanding of the workings of wall street.
Wishful thinking and baseless accusations weaken our postion.

I posted an article that states that the 100 grand Terry baby put up CAME FROM WINNICK himself:

In 1997, Winnick hired Terry McAuliffe, Clinton's chief fundraiser, as a consultant. According to the New York Times, the $100,000 he paid McAuliffe turned into an $18 million windfall as McAuliffe's contacts helped Global Crossing's stock climb.

"And your point is...???"

Well,GEE...if you read the bold sentences in each post above, S-L-O-W-L-Y, I'll bet you can figure it out.

I think the democrats BANKED on Algore winning.
I ALSO think that,sooner or later, your friend Terry, the DNC pimp, is going down.
Now, buzz off.

"I choose to ignore your rudeness just this once, and respond"

That's funny. I guess I shouldn't expect a response to this post (vbg).

Sorry to cloud your argument with facts, but TM isn't (as you state) my friend.

Obviously you are unaware that the payment for consulting services right here in the USA is often made using equity such as stock or options. And in the late 90's it was normal fare. Foe start ups it was the rule so as to coserve corporate cash. Pre IPO shares were the most desired of the lot.

The accusations of "insider trading" (actually, to be a crime the correct term is 'illegal insider trading')and "market manipulation" were claimed. As yet, neither you nor anyone else has provided ANYTHING that would support either accusation.

TM did not have the position or power to manipulate the market prices of GX, if you think he does or ever did, you need to do some homework.

Look, you may choose to believe me rude, so be it. But that does not change the FACT that what is known about TM's GX transaction (start to finish) does not reveal anything that is illegal or even unethical (Unethical in the realm of wall street and politics).