Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LoisHunt
"Happy" is not an appropriate word, if used in the modern American sense of frivolous consumerism and mindless debauchery. But, yes, I am willing to go so far as to say that the Russian commons were happy in their Faith and in their traditions. Life was uncomfortable for them, just as life was uncomfortable for everybody -- and still is in most of the world.

But to portray the Russian peasantry as living in a life of incessant horror and violence is simply not borne out by their conduct with respect to the forces of so-called enlightenment as embodied in the Grande Armée. Were the Russians as downtrodden and miserable as you (and the Soviet historians) suggest, then why was there no massive insurrection on behalf of Mr. Buonaparte? Why, in fact, did volunteer organisations spring up to fight the French?

Your view of Russia prior to Communism has been clearly influenced by Soviet Agitprop. I suggest you go read some Solzhenitsyn. Or Tolstoy.

31 posted on 02/11/2002 6:27:44 AM PST by Goetz_von_Berlichingen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen
Soviet Agitprop??????

Dear Lord. No. Just common sense that Russia was a miserable country for those peasants.

The hope is that our war will make a better life for the Afghans. We're freeing them from oppressive rulers but we had to go to war and drop bombs and kill civilians by accident to do it. But we're not doing it for their interests. The Afghan peasants didn't revolt against the Taliban or join us in fighting the Taliban except when given money to do so. But if we stay there too long, they'll mobilize to drive us out.

34 posted on 02/11/2002 11:27:42 AM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson