Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toujours l'audace!
U.S. News ^ | 02/18/2002 | Michael Barone

Posted on 02/09/2002 12:28:38 PM PST by Pokey78

Most of the reaction to George W. Bush's audacious State of the Union message has focused on his virtual declaration of war against the "axis of terror"–North Korea, Iran, and Iraq. And rightly so. The first stage of the war against terrorism, Afghanistan, is not over, and the second stage–the "low-hanging fruit" of Somalia, Yemen, and the Philippines–has only quietly begun, but Bush proclaimed a third stage, which seems likely to include an invasion of Iraq. The president was just as audacious on domestic policy. "Toujours l'audace!" proclaims a French military slogan–always boldness! Bush has heeded that advice, to the astonishment of our foreign enemies and the surprise of his domestic critics.

Bush started off by admitting the budget will be in deficit but saying it "will be small and short term, so long as Congress restrains spending and acts in a fiscally responsible manner." That means Bush will use his veto threat to hold the line on nondefense spending. That leaves Democrats and ap-propriators of both parties seething. But they know they can't win a public battle with a president with an 80 percent positive job rating.

Bush also threatened to confront Majority Leader Tom Daschle if he prevents the Senate from acting on energy and trade promotion authority bills. Ditto with the stimulus package, which Daschle has blocked in the hope that Democrats would score in November if voters focus on economic issues. But voters give Bush high job ratings on the economy and do not blame him for budget deficits; the January bipartisan Battleground poll shows them favoring Bush over congressional Democrats on improving the economy (46 percent to 35 percent) and balancing the federal budget (43 percent to 36 percent). Consequently, blocking action on the trade, energy, and stimulus bills is more likely to lose than gain votes for Democrats.

On Democrats' turf. In another show of boldness, Bush made mention of issues that Democrats have long claimed–the so-called patients' bill of rights, tax credits for health insurance for the uninsured, and prescription drugs as part of Medicare. Bush has a position on each that significantly differs from the Democrats', and he has shown he will press for his version. The outcome Bush seeks: new laws that Democrats won't like and that will deprive them of campaign issues. In the meantime, he moved quickly to deny them another potential campaign issue–Enron–by calling for 401(k) reform, stricter accounting standards, and tougher disclosure requirements for corporations.

Bush was similarly bold in repeating his call for "personal retirement accounts for younger workers who choose them" as part of Social Security. This is an issue Republican House members would like to avoid and one that Democrats will latch onto as alleged evidence that Republicans would deprive retirees of benefits. But large majorities agree with Bush when the issue is framed his way–more choices for youngsters, guaranteed benefits for oldsters. He seems determined to use his political capital to avoid damage among the elderly and make gains among the young.

Bush's boldness comes as evidence mounts that the Republican Party has gained strength since September 11. For about three months, polls showed relatively little change in the close divide between the two parties, evident since 1995. But polls in December and January show a shift toward Republicans. Ipsos-Reid bimonthly polls before September 11 showed 46 percent of voters identifying as Democrats and 37 percent as Republicans. After September 11, it has been 43 percent Democrats, 42 percent Republicans. Eight national polls in January showed Republicans ahead in generic vote (which party's candidate you would vote for in the House) by 42 percent to 40 percent. Most pre-September 11 polls had Democrats ahead. And that question has been less favorable to Republicans since 1995 than the eventual vote. Democratic pollster Peter Hart prefers to ask which party voters would like to control Congress; an NBC News/Wall Street Journal January poll indicated Republicans by 44 percent to 40 percent.

Bush strategist Karl Rove looks back to William McKinley, who was elected with 51 percent of the vote in 1896 but whose successful war and domestic policies built that up to a solid Republican majority for years ahead. In a politics with an even partisan split, Rove says, "Small, permanent changes are critical." George W. Bush has shown a boldness that neither enemies nor critics expected. Now we will see whether it makes this small partisan change permanent.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2002 12:28:38 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
bump
2 posted on 02/09/2002 12:32:03 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"..."Toujours l'audace!" proclaims a French military slogan..."

It is a Napoleonic slogan, to be precise.

"L'audace; encore l'audace; et toujours l'audace."

Napoleon was, of course, the proto-Hitler in European history. Hitler is unthinkable without Napoleon. However Barone is confindent that nobody in America can connect the dots.

The dots; again, the dots; connect the dots.....

3 posted on 02/09/2002 12:37:24 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
When can we expect a post of houshold hints from Herr Hitler?

(Something about the "Big Lie" and all that jazz....)

4 posted on 02/09/2002 12:43:47 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
'Audacity is 9O per cent of the battle.' --Karl Marx
5 posted on 02/09/2002 12:45:30 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
Napoleon was Hitler? Think how much better off under the Napoleonic Code the Russians would have been than living as slaves who didn't own their own hair under their own nobles. If Napoleon had conquered Russia, the Russians would have been free almost 200 years earlier than they were.
6 posted on 02/09/2002 12:48:06 PM PST by LoisHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Audacious? and they do not find Vedrin's picking up Bin Laden's batton relating to support of Israel and America's supposedly imaginary terrorist chimeras?

If there was support for terrorism, it did come out tacitly from the French.

Europe is quaking in its boots. I know Europeans. When they have a problem they fear explaining it lest they feel debased and inferior. They will stubbornly say no no and invoke outrageous reasons when the sole problem was just a little bit of lack of confidence...

This is European inferiority complex amplified to the power 10. They are litteraly sh!ting in their pants. Too bad, may they do so for valid reasons against them that will come to happen. I wonder what kind of blackmail they are under.

7 posted on 02/09/2002 12:51:05 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
"...If Napoleon had conquered Russia, the Russians would have been free almost 200 years earlier than they were...."

Yes. Of course. Freedom at the point of a gun. A splendid vision indeed.

Click to view full-sized image

The Third of May 1808
Francisco de Goya

8 posted on 02/09/2002 12:54:39 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
Unlike Hitler, Napoleon was a true military genius and worth studying if only for that. PS - Remember in the movie Patton when George C. Scott quotes that line? It was a great scene.
9 posted on 02/09/2002 12:55:12 PM PST by Gordian Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Our President is a very brave man. It's a long way to November, and other Republicans need to play their cards right, but judging by the huge cheers our Dubya draws wherever he goes, it's going to take something really big to make a dent in his popularity. For those who watched the Olympics opening ceremony last night, weren't those roars from the crowd every time the President appeared just wonderful? Music to my ears, that's for sure. It was also really cool that he gave the U.S. athletes a pep talk before the opening ceremonies, joined them in the stands as he officially opened the games, then sat with them for awhile after that. First leader of any country ever to do that. I don't doubt it gave the Secret Service heartburn, but it was a wonderful and brave gesture. I tell ya, at this point I'd follow Dubya anywhere, and I know I'm not alone.
10 posted on 02/09/2002 12:55:24 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
Actually, Georges Jaques Danton (a French revolutionary leader) said it. The exact quote is: "Il nous faus de l'audace, encore l'audace, toujours l'audace." Roughly, we must be audacious, still more audacious, always audacious.
11 posted on 02/09/2002 1:10:16 PM PST by financeprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
It was also really cool that he gave the U.S. athletes a pep talk before the opening ceremonies, joined them in the stands as he officially opened the games, then sat with them for awhile after that. First leader of any country ever to do that.

Are you trying to tell me that Franklin Delano Roosevelt didn't sit in the stands with Jesse Owens in the '36 Oleolympics?

12 posted on 02/09/2002 1:16:56 PM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: financeprof
My only advice, offered in true humilty, is to take with a large grain du sel any bon mot attributed to the celebrities of the Revolution. Their partisans--in life and after death--were apt to graze on other people's vocal chords---if you know what I mean--depending upon which way the wind was farting.

(Of course, that applies to the little coporal a thousand times over! REF...)

13 posted on 02/09/2002 1:22:01 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: financeprof
Thank you for that. I too always thought it was Bonaparte who did the audace bit. Of course Nappy died in bed while Danton lost his head on Monsieur Guillotine's clever gadget. There must be a moral there somewhere.
14 posted on 02/09/2002 1:29:00 PM PST by deroberst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gordian Blade
"...Unlike Hitler, Napoleon was a true military genius and worth studying if only for that. PS - Remember in the movie Patton when George C. Scott quotes that line? It was a great scene...."

But this is a subject worthy of its own thousand-post thread!

What have we lost in the march towards dysfunctional Empire? Men like Patton, that's whom! The intelligent, quirky stallion harnessed.

Our Founding Fathers were so brilliant--so precient in so many ways (as the dying often are). I can only read--breathless--the accounts of Washington's showdown in the barn with his officers who were threatening to stage a junta-like revolution because of the insufficiencies of the Second Continental Congress. What a wonderful moment in human history!! All lost and forgotten by the impotent little apparachiks of the modern American bureaucratic/managerial State.

15 posted on 02/09/2002 1:33:00 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: deroberst
"...Thank you for that...."

You're easy to roll....

16 posted on 02/09/2002 1:35:18 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
Youbetcha
17 posted on 02/09/2002 2:05:47 PM PST by deroberst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Rather than get bogged down over the source of the quote, as some posters to this thread seem to be doing, let's just focus on the article. Barone is one of the most knowledgeable men about politics writing today, and his point that a politician needs to keep pushing an agenda to succeed is well taken.
18 posted on 02/09/2002 2:07:31 PM PST by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thucydides
I am not bogged down in the source of the quote. I understand the milieu of the quotation very well--and am apalled.

A bon mottossed about in a gathering of fools, however "well meaning", always results in oceans of blood. Consequently, the source of the Word is worth the wade through the bog.

The Word, as you will recall, was made flesh--and changed the world.....

19 posted on 02/09/2002 2:27:11 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: deroberst
This sheds a whole new light on "let's roll!"--doesn't it?
20 posted on 02/09/2002 2:31:30 PM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson