Would it help to know that locusts are kosher?
To confirm evolution you must show how it can ADD NEW INFO in genes, not turn on or off swithces for previously existing info- unless that 1st cell had all that potential in it from the start. If that is the case, and it may be, it would support Theistic Evolution much more than the naturalistic kind.
New info is good and necessary, but don't discount the importance of losing your training wheels.
Au contraire my toothy friend. Training wheels are pretty useless unless one has the whole bike to begin with! Did the first cell have the 'whole bike' (code potential for every gene of every creature that has ever lived on Earth) in its DNA? If so, I find it astonishing beyond any belief that such a cell was the result of chance alone.