The luminescence assays used to detect gene expression is not a flaw in these studies. I will look up the specific quotes you are quibbling about, but I'm finding unfounded criticisms of research methods a poor substitute for a criticism of the central thesis of the paper.
I'm off to play some tennis, but I'll return to this later.
That speaks volumes. I said nothing about flaws, I was stating what was "factual", after all, the top quark is a hump on a graph.