Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve-b
Frankly, this defense implies that Ashcroft's statement is a cowardly means of giving a directive without taking responsibility for any subsequent results, a la Henry II's "Will no friend rid me of this troublesome priest?"

Thats your interpretation, an unsupportable one. Apparently the only way Ashcroft can satisfy your standards is to not make public statements.

As far as I'm concerned (for example) Ashcroft was more likely talking about the ACLU types who made such a fuss about the conditions in Camp Xray that some moslim fanatics felt compelled to kidnap a WSJ reporter hostage to offer in exchange for better conditions for the prisoners.

173 posted on 02/06/2002 7:30:17 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter
His words mean something. Like I said if he said that some folks are "over-reacting" or "thin skinned" then fine. He called us terrorist aiders. That's ridiculous.
179 posted on 02/06/2002 7:34:00 AM PST by francisandbeans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: skeeter
As far as I'm concerned (for example) Ashcroft was more likely talking about the ACLU types who made such a fuss about the conditions in Camp Xray that some moslim fanatics felt compelled to kidnap a WSJ reporter hostage to offer in exchange for better conditions for the prisoners

Then you would be wrong. When this statement was made the detainees were still in Afghanistan.

216 posted on 02/06/2002 7:55:17 AM PST by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson