Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
"For everyone who says she ruled as a liberal judge and made up law....she did just the opposite. She took literal meaning of statute.

Show me:
As I understood it, the only basis was omission in a subsequent action - not an action to delete a universally accepted rule.

81 posted on 02/04/2002 1:16:19 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: norton
not an action to delete a universally accepted rule

That is the main problem as I see it. Almost every other appointment in either the public sector or the private sector provides specifically for a vacancy appointment and this revised statute did not.

In addition, one of the earliest house versions of this new statute did contain appointment language which was dropped whe adopting the senate version.

95 posted on 02/04/2002 1:45:40 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson