Replies

You were the only one who said that labeling a government a "Constitutional Republic" was dependent on this. I don’t believe so. -EM2

This is what I posted

"O'Reilly now agrees, positing that Bush will reactivate the Clinton probe only if the GOP regains control of the Senate or if "things get rough."" -article

If this is really what is happening, the USA is no longer the republic established by 'The Constitution.'

It is no less than that.

+++++++++++++++++++++

There is a vast difference - hint - Bush is not saying he will not prosecute, according to the article, bush is blackmailing the Dems with the threat of prosecution.

Big difference.

Get it? - or do you care to further misquote and make more circular , yet vaggue, assertions.

BYE

"If this is really what is happening, the USA is no longer the republic established by 'The Constitution.'
It is no less than that. "

Your #149 post was not clear, but in all our back and forths, we've been referring to the inability of nations to prosecute popular ex-executives rather than an executive's threat to prosecute. If the former was not what you were criticizing as being inconsistent with our constitutional republic, you should have said so before now. If you speak in "hints", you're going to have misunderstandings.