That is ONLY your opinion. The fact is, our society is mostly in the dark about the crimes committed by the Clinton administration and DNC. Most have never even heard of Loral, the Riady non-refund, that military pathologists suspect Brown was murdered, have ever heard of FBI-COVERUP.COM, that the DNC may be blackmailing Republican congressmen using THOUSANDS of FBI files that they STOLE, the details in emailgate, and on and on and on. You witnessed their outrage when the details of pardongate surfaced. Imagine their outrage when they find that Clinton and his gang of thieves committed murder, treason, blackmail and who knows what else!
Bush would have never been elected if he promoted enforcing the law literally in every way.
Bush would have been elected HANDS DOWN if the public had been aware of even a TENTH of the crimes committed by the DNC and Clinton administration. Hiding from the problem of the media does not solve the problem ... it only makes it worse. The ONLY way to bypass the media is to use the courts. Even the mainstream media can't ignore trials involving the top level of the DNC and Clinton administrations ... especially now that Fox News is there to keep them honest.
If it wasn't for roughly 700 voters in my state with enough common sense to not be persuaded by psycho-rants of 3rd parties, the Clinton/Gore team would be in charge, and Kyoto would be law.
Well if the GOP (assuming you are speaking on their behalf) think that desiring equal treatment under the law for our politicos is a "psycho - rant", then perhaps you can expect to LOOSE the next election. A GREAT MANY voted for Bush hoping that he'd clean up the government, but if that isn't going to happen, then what's the difference between having a democRAT in office and a republican ... if both are going to ignore the law? Frankly, I'd rather have the opponent in office whose motive I understand (the DNC) then a group whose motives I don't. Perhaps it is time to send a message to the GOP.
Hmm, If I say the obvious but without evidence, it's "only my opinion". If you do the same, it's a fact. {smile}
My opinion is that it's a fact that polls would prove both our suppositions correct. Most don't know, and most don't want the division that would accompany impeachment style prosecutions. Perhaps education would change those numbers, but it would likely be countered, the nation re-divided and Bush's real agenda paralyzed. I took me a very long time to recognize this, but I think Bush "was a chooser" and made a smart choice.
"A GREAT MANY voted for Bush hoping that he'd clean up the government, but if that isn't going to happen, then what's the difference between having a democRAT in office and a republican ... if both are going to ignore the law? Frankly, I'd rather have the opponent in office whose motive I understand (the DNC) then a group whose motives I don't. Perhaps it is time to send a message to the GOP."
Bush didn’t campaign on prosecution of Clinton. If you can't tell the difference between the RP and the DP, I can't do anything about it.
"I'd rather have the opponent in office whose motive I understand (the DNC) then a group whose motives I don't. Perhaps it is time to send a message to the GOP."
Yea, maybe we should use the model of thousands of "principled progressives" in Florida who sent a message to he DNC and voted Green.