Actually, it was a question.
What the hell, I haven't reminded anyone in about 80 posts!
Actually, it was a question.
What the hell, I haven't reminded anyone in about 80 posts!
Actually, it was an argument cast as a question.
And I still don't understand why it needs an answer, since we don't presently contend that it's a necessary ingredient of the evolutionary story.
Okay, but it was an interesting basis for an argument that wasn't just the standard recycled top-10 list of debunked pseudo-scientific creationist attacks on evolution.