The term species is very loosely used by evolutionists. Care to define it?
Evolution is not about species anyways. It is about new added characteristics to a species's genome. Otherwise man could have never evolved from an amoeba or a bacterium or some such simple creature as evolutionists constantly claim to have occurred but are totally unable to give any proof of.
BTW - note that the definition has to include proof for completely dead species also since evolutionists also love to classify things by a few bones found here and there.
Sigh. Why is it always starting from scratch again with you?
Natural sciences are not in the proof business. Proofs are a phenomena of pure mathematics, and 13th century theology.
"A fundamental category of taxonomic classification, ranking below a genus or subgenus and consisting of related organisms capable of interbreeding. "
Evolution is not about species anyways. It is about new added characteristics to a species's genome.
... which result in another species.