Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
That some animals cannot mate with others is not proof that new characteristics have arisen, only that something is different.

Yeeeess... And what is different is that there are now two species where before there was one. Thus acts of speciation have been observed (or near as dammit). Since evolution at the species level is macroevolution, then macroevolution has been observed.

143 posted on 02/03/2002 9:58:56 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Stultis
"And what is different is that there are now two species where before there was one."

Nope. A chihuahua cannot physically mate with a great dane, yet both are of the same species. To prove evolution (which you cannot) you have to prove the creation of new characteristics. This no evolutionist has done. The worm is still a worm, they fruitflies are still fruitflies, the moths are still moths. This is selection, not evolution. Two very different things. For us to have developed from an amoeba to a human thousands of new genes, new biological systems, new organs had to be developed. The evolutionists cannot give proof of any such thing ever having happened.

297 posted on 02/04/2002 8:49:52 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson