Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doosee
Despite all the arguments of all the opponents about revenue, efficacy, etc., the NATIONAL RETAIL SALES TAX remains the MOST FAIR AND LEAST INTRUSIVE idea for taxation, period.

For this reason alone, it should be instituted.

2 posted on 02/03/2002 3:24:00 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
., the NATIONAL RETAIL SALES TAX remains the MOST FAIR AND LEAST INTRUSIVE idea for taxation, period.

I am so fed up with our current tax system that I would gladly take the retail tax or even a flat income tax. With the retail tax, food and medical items should be exempted from all tax.

4 posted on 02/03/2002 3:35:18 AM PST by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
the NATIONAL RETAIL SALES TAX

It might be ---but what about large families who must buy more things including food? They could easily end up paying much more tax than a childless couple with a very high income and huge bank accounts.

13 posted on 02/03/2002 5:08:21 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins;pigdog;ancient geezer;taxreform
...the NATIONAL RETAIL SALES TAX remains the MOST FAIR AND LEAST INTRUSIVE idea for taxation, period.

A M E N! ! !

It's all about F R E E D O M!!!!

16 posted on 02/03/2002 5:25:32 AM PST by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
"Despite all the arguments of all the opponents about revenue, efficacy, etc., the NATIONAL RETAIL SALES TAX remains the MOST FAIR AND LEAST INTRUSIVE idea for taxation, period."

I don't see why sales tax is preferable to income tax. It seems similar to a flat tax, since spending patterns don't vary as widely as income. I drive a $20K car, Bill Gates drives possibly a $80K car, but the difference in our incomes is a lot more than 4x.

To supporters of a flat tax: there are two ways to do it. (a) You charge tax so low that the homeless bum can afford to pay it, in which case Bill Gates is essentially freeloading, because the extent to which he benefits from public infrastructure, roads, law enforcement and national defense is a lot more than the extent to which the homeless bum benefits from it. Also, in this case, you probably won't raise enough money to build a single freeway or maintain a single Air Force fighter. (b) You charge tax so high that everyone below the poverty line starves, and Bill Gates is *still* freeloading.

No, I don't see a flat tax as realistic.

Additionally, a high retail tax discourages spending, which is bad for the economy.

190 posted on 02/10/2002 7:38:31 AM PST by luckyluke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
Despite all the arguments of all the opponents about revenue, efficacy, etc., the NATIONAL RETAIL SALES TAX remains the MOST FAIR AND LEAST INTRUSIVE idea for taxation, period.

The fact is, rapacious taxation, and FICA, funds socialist programs. It is without question that socialism destroys any system it touches, including constitutional republics organized under the rule of law.

To transfer that funding from one system to another is pointless, in terms of funding. And to transfer to a system, the abuse of which can only be protested by not having access to thngs like food and shelter, and the material items that are necessary for the body to live, is not very wise.

193 posted on 02/10/2002 7:54:11 AM PST by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson