Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA extinguishes global-warming fire
Washington Times ^ | February 3, 2002 | Patrick Michaels

Posted on 02/03/2002 3:17:00 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:50:51 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

It really happened. The NASA scientist who lit the bonfire of the global warming vanities with his flamboyant congressional testimony 14 years ago, has turned the hose on its dying embers.

There is now no reason for the Bush administration to give an inch on climate change. Sure, energy efficient technologies (like my Honda hybrid) are worth exploring. But there is absolutely no scientific reason for any expensive policy like the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. Mr. Bush led the world by being the first to walk away from Kyoto, and science has proven him correct.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; enviralists; epa; globalwarminghoax; methane; opec; petroleum; popefrancis; romancatholicism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: Texas_Longhorn
Do you know what the most abundabt green house gas is? Take a guess on it's percentage at sealevel for the average of the Earth's atmosphere.
61 posted on 02/03/2002 2:12:33 PM PST by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
What I am most interested in is the ice content of the earth. The ice acts like a thermostat, and helps maintain a fairly constant temperature on the earth by using energy to melt. If one can see a consistant deterioration or the worlds ice content then one could assume an increase of energy upon the earth. Not that green house gases might have anything to do with it if there was a marked decrease but that is what I would look for instead of world climate changes.
62 posted on 02/03/2002 2:24:53 PM PST by Goblins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Longhorn
Just where does Bevo go when she is sick?
63 posted on 02/03/2002 6:27:59 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
A large empty room that is cool, soon becomes uncomfortably warm when it is filled with people. So, my question is, if a heat increase, with time, is true for the air in a crowded room, then why is it not true for the atmosphere of our increasingly crowded planet?

Yeah, but the specific heat of the room and its contents actually goes down as people are added. What I was talking about was making measurements of the temperature for years at say 15' from the person, then gradually moving closer and closer until you're making oral temperature measurements.

People are warm, but compared to solar flux and radioactive decay, our biochemistry is a small contribution to the Earth's heat balance.

64 posted on 02/03/2002 6:54:06 PM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson