[summer]

I disagree too, but I think I understand why this author has such a take on it: he, and some others, just can not give GW constant credit for something as crucial as protecting our nation against terrorism.

The opposition claims they give GW this credit, but, they are searching for ways to keep our mind off it. But -- GW gets the credit. Period.

[Mia T]

 

Jonathan Alter doesn't have a Q ERTY6 clue the clintons were utter failures (and the GOP had better exploit it) BUMP!

We must take the offensive.

Addressing the Conservative Political Action Conference today (C-SPAN), Bob Livingston dispatched "it's the economy, stupid," the clinton mantra -- (and together with the FBI files, the only thing that kept the co-rapists in the Oval Office and out of the slammer) -- with an incisiveness and toughness not usually associated with the GOP. (Is the right finally getting it?)

Livingston said the "it's the economy, stupid" clinton scheme demonstrated that the clintons and their gang "are either stupid, themselves, or they were derelict."

Fraudulent Democrat Scheme Fails as Bush Soars

 

BUSH: NATIONAL SECURITY 1^st PRIORITY. . ."I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

 

THE CLINTON LEGACY PLACED IN STARK RELIEF

 

by Mia T, January 31, 2002

 

y any measure, the Carville-Shrum scheme to attack Bush by clintonoid compartmentalization ("praise the Bush war effort / pan the Bush character and economy") isn't working. Ask any pollster or pundit. 

It's the terrorism...and character...stupid

The Carville-Shrum scheme fails because the schemers fail to understand that terrorism necessarily subsumes the economy, that "it's the terrorism, stupid," to paraphrase Carville. The Carville-Shrum scheme fails also because the schemers fail to understand that bill clinton, to paraphrase Lloyd Benson, is no George Bush...and conversely...and the people know it.

 

But perhaps the most compelling reason that the Carville-Shrum scheme fails is that it is a fraud...and the people know it.

 

Compartmentalization scheme a fraud

Does anyone still sentient after eight years of the clintons really believe that the clintons and their "infrastructure" really want Bush to succeed where the co-rapists failed so utterly?

To sabotage Bush is merely to extend into realtime the method of legacy-building historically preferred by the clintons; that is, trash other presidents in an effort to hoist their own sorry collective heft from history's dustbin.

The clintons are constitutionally incapable of understanding that the bottom line is not power or money or Nobel Peace Prizes, and certainly not misbegotten power or money or Nobel Peace Prizes.

They and their minions continue to undermine the Bush war effort even as they assume poses and mouth poll-tested phrases to the contrary. But Bush sees right through this.

In his State of the Union speech, Bush told us:

Our first priority must always be the security of our nation... I will not wait on events, while dangers gather.  I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer... We can't stop short.  If we stop now -- leaving terror camps intact and terror states unchecked -- our sense of security would be false and temporary...The price of indifference would be catastrophic.

This was a direct blow to the collective clinton scheme...and paunch...and legacy.