I find you in an inconsistency here. First, you assert that all sorts of essential functions being performed by the federal government, ranging from agricultural policy to law enforcement, would end and be pushed back to the state governments that are incapable of performing them if we adhered to the Constitution. Second, you assert that the federal government already adheres to the Constitution, as evidenced by the fact that "conservatives" control the House of Representatives.
Well, which is it? If the federal government is already following the Constitution to the letter, then no government policies would be interrupted. Please actually explain this rather than dismissing this observation as jargon and slogan.