Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UberVernunft
Sorry, I've seen posts before that give eyewitness accounts. In order for them all to be true there would have had to be 6 different missiles.
78 posted on 01/31/2002 9:03:35 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Sorry, I've seen posts before that give eyewitness accounts. In order for them all to be true there would have had to be 6 different missiles.

Sorry, I just went through this. There will be differences between witnesses, but there is a commonality in the descriptions that imply that *at least* one missile was identified. As I mentioned previously some witnesses are more reliable than others. There will always be some differences in descriptions.

Evidence for 6 missiles does nothing to refute the contention of *no* missiles. Surely you understand this?

You have commited a non-sequitur.

82 posted on 01/31/2002 9:18:04 AM PST by UberVernunft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
In all of the months and years I was at sea on a U.S. Sub, I can't tell you how many times a lone sailor was standing out on the deck alone.

If they were surfaced, there would be a minimum of 3 sailors in the sail. No one would be allowed on deck (except during manuevering watch in the harbor) because there are no railings and too much deck wash.

83 posted on 01/31/2002 9:18:39 AM PST by ChippewaDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson