Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UberVernunft
"This is enough evidence to convince most people."

Sorry, I'm a "most people" and this sort of conspiracy nonsense convinces me not at all. For this to be true, anyone who examined the wreckage, including scores of NTSB and FBI agents would have to be "in on it".

This is the sort of black helicopter/Bildeberger/UFO abduction/NWO Masons/Trilateral Commission/poison contrails/fake moon landings and other WorldNutDaily nonsense that is de-rigeur for the fashionably paranoid.

Total and complete crap…

26 posted on 01/31/2002 5:00:17 AM PST by Dr. Luv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Luv
Sorry, I'm a "most people" and this sort of conspiracy nonsense convinces me not at all.

You're just ignoring strong evidence that specifically points to a missle impact.

points For this to be true, anyone who examined the wreckage, including scores of NTSB and FBI agents would have to be "in on it".

Just as in other crash investigations they might not have a clue. No need to be "in on it". Just numerous unknowns mixed in with general incompetence, all under the corruption of the Clinton administration.

29 posted on 01/31/2002 5:05:03 AM PST by UberVernunft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Luv
This is the sort of black helicopter/Bildeberger/UFO abduction/NWO Masons/Trilateral Commission/poison contrails/fake moon landings and other WorldNutDaily nonsense that is de-rigeur for the fashionably paranoid.

LOL.

What does this have to do with paranoia? The evidence is quite clear. There are no secret theories needed to explain it -- nearly 100 witnesses saw a "missle", or a lighted object, shoot from the ground toward the sky. This is also been triangulated to a fixed location where the plane was flying along it's flight path. The crash debris pattern only fits the profile of an externally impacted object. What's conspiratorial about this evidence? Just because the NTSB or FBI decides to ignore it doesn't invalidate it.

Total and complete crap…

Yes, that pretty much describes the fuel tank explosion "theory".

30 posted on 01/31/2002 5:10:36 AM PST by UberVernunft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Luv
This is the sort of ... Bildeberger...Trilateral Commission

You do realize that there is a group that meets on an annual basis for 'Bilderberg Conferences'?

There is also an International relations organization called the 'Trilateral Commission'. They even have a web page.

Trilateral Commission

I am not claiming any kind of special conspiratorial meaning in these organizations, but they certainly do exist.

36 posted on 01/31/2002 5:22:43 AM PST by UberVernunft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Luv
Would you care to explain how you get jet A fuel (kerosene) to explode with a spark? Would you care to explain why 200+ witnesses saw something go upward before the big explosion? I'm not with the Navy theory, but something external struck TWA800 that came from the surface.
37 posted on 01/31/2002 5:23:13 AM PST by Techster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Luv
"Total and complete crap…"

... until the 'boy who cried wolf' lost the entire flock to the 'real one'.

53 posted on 01/31/2002 5:49:15 AM PST by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson