Replies

It really isn't hard to counter evidence that doesn't exist in the first place. Or maybe you can be the first to actually provide proof that "hundreds of witnesses...saw a light streak up from the ground toward the plane". This is just another example of myth and inaccurate reporting becoming "reality". Even the late great CMDR Donaldson's website lists the number of witnesses you describe as 96. That's out of 755 eyewitness reports.

So what? I thought the number was closer to 130 or so. I used the term "hundreds" as a general way of describing this number. My version of Microsoft Bookshelf lists the definition of "hundreds" as "The numbers between 100 and 999". If the number is closer to 96, this does nothing to weaken the evidence. Surely you can understand this?

The fact that you don't see a difference between a number less than 100 and "hundreds" explains how you can see irrefutable evidence of a missile shootdown. I hope you aren't an accountant. I'd hate for someone to tell me I was going to be getting hundreds of dollars of investment returns only to be presented with a check for 96 bucks. But hey, if you have to stretch and distort the facts to build evidence for a good conspiracy, don't let the truth stand in your way. WND certainly doesn't.