Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark
The latter three...

The rule is: the latter of two, the last of three or more.

Mon Dieu, Boston Globe! Eet ees to roll les yeuxes!

12 posted on 01/30/2002 11:47:30 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Grut
The rule is: the latter of two, the last of three or more.

Yes, of course. Since the author correctly used "latter" here -- in a list of four (Rakove, Main, Gruber, and Roth), there are two threes: the former (Rakove, Main, and Gruber) and the latter (Main, Gruber, and Roth) -- I'm left wondering why you brought it up. ;-)

16 posted on 01/30/2002 12:05:28 PM PST by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson