Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WindRiverShoshoni
Actually, the4 case I was thinking of, was in N.Y. ; so you are citing something else entirely. Hmmmmm ...

I doubt that this has much of anything at all to do with " oggling ". For the record, I don't like oggling, and LOATHE rude remarks . Getting back on topic ; the first woman, Mrs. Freeman, is a born citizen, who is using her new found religon, to try to bend the law; to suit her own purpose. Many female follewrs of Islam, do NOT wear that thingy. Some do , and they belong to stricter sects, which FORBID those women to drive, and I am quite certain, do other things, which Mrs. Freeman does do.

Now, dear, try to wiggle out of that. : - )

82 posted on 01/30/2002 12:36:59 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons
Right-o. If someone was to declare that it is against their religion to even have their picture taken? What? We can allow them to have no picture. Separation of Church and State means that this country has laws that uphold the law and order, not religions. If you want to be a citizen here, you have to follow our laws.. laws for everyone, equally.
88 posted on 01/30/2002 12:47:54 AM PST by My back yard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson