Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Propose Help for Uninsured
AP via NYTimes.com ^ | 1/29/02

Posted on 01/29/2002 1:10:56 PM PST by GeneD

Filed at 4:59 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush will ask Congress for new tax credits to help people buy health insurance and more than $3 billion to expand government-run insurance programs, boosting ideas supported by both liberals and conservatives.

The president also plans to ask for more money for community health centers, who care for many uninsured patients and have long been promoted by Bush as an important part of the nation's health-care solution.

With 44 million Americans lacking insurance, the issue is before Congress constantly. Still, lawmakers failed to act last year, and debate over how much the unemployed need to help pay for health insurance has kept a stimulus package stuck on Capitol Hill.

The Bush plan will be detailed in the budget he submits to Congress next week. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson is expected to preview it Wednesday.

The first piece of his proposal would recycle $3.2 billion allocated to the Children's Health Insurance Program but not spent by states. The money is scheduled to return to the federal treasury, but Bush is asking Congress to make it available to states that want to expand their CHIP plans and Medicaid to more low-income children or to their parents.

This is the approach to helping the uninsured that Democrats generally prefer. These state-run programs offer families health insurance directly, meaning parents don't have to shop around for coverage and are guaranteed a basic package of benefits.

Conservatives typically prefer a free-market approach, which would have families choose their own health insurance packages in the open market. Bush's plan, first made when he was running for president and included in his budget last year, will offer tax breaks to help pay often-steep premiums.

This year's proposal will be essentially unchanged and worth up to $1,000 per person or $2,000 per couple, according to an administration official speaking on condition of anonymity. Like last year, it will be available to people who don't owe federal taxes -- typically people with very low incomes.

Last year's proposal, which was phased in over a number of years, set the income limit at $30,000 in adjusted gross income for individual tax filers and $60,000 for married couples.

The plan's cost was estimated at $71.5 billion over 10 years.

The president also will propose an increase of $114 million for community health centers, bringing the total to $1.5 billion, an 8 percent increase over this year's appropriation.

Additionally, the budget plan will propose $350 million to continue Medicaid coverage for families that have recently left welfare. Without this extension, most parents would lose health coverage when they left the rolls. Eligibility for some help would continue for many children, but the new coverage might cost these families more than Medicaid did.

``Making Medicaid available during the welfare-to-work period encourages people to become employed by ensuring that their efforts to find jobs won't result in lost health coverage,'' Thompson said last week in announcing this proposal. ``We're continuing to make sure that work pays for our families.''


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: DoughtyOne

"Thinks it's 'bout time for some more peein' on my conservative base"


41 posted on 01/29/2002 3:39:07 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
You got that right! Coercion in its most insidious form. As everyone else has been saying, it sounds like one of Al Gore's schemes.
Feel the gin
42 posted on 01/29/2002 3:52:59 PM PST by Cosmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hattend
There are already enough federal programs to shelter the lives of those truly in need.

Since need is a subjective term, they're will never ever be enough programs. Never ever.
43 posted on 01/29/2002 4:05:51 PM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
bttt
44 posted on 01/29/2002 4:11:43 PM PST by LiberteeBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Bush is simply expanding the existing safety net to catch some of those who have fallen off the private insurance market. Once the economy kicks in, the safety net can be retracted as the number of uninsured shrinks.

Look at the facts....no government program has ever "retracted"

45 posted on 01/29/2002 4:29:03 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Once the economy kicks in, the safety net can be retracted as the number of uninsured shrinks.

Lemme guess, you're another one of those that think Bush is promulgating some covert grand scheme to grow government to enormous proportions now, so that he can scale it back later?

Are there actually people this effen' daft?

46 posted on 01/29/2002 4:33:20 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Rather Clintonesque.....or should we call it Blintonesque!
47 posted on 01/29/2002 5:38:46 PM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I had to give up MY own purchased insurance for health care....I am a widow.....at the time my monthly premium was $98.40 with a a $5,000 deductible. Up pops Uncle Sam demanding all sorts of s**t be covered, and with the usual increase based on age....my premium jumped 58%. Thanks to good, kind, beneveolent Uncle Sam.

I finally got wise, too, to taking care of everybody elses' brats! Damn funny I had to do it all for my kids.....but government can force me to take care of others, too.....F'em....I quit smoking....now y'all can divvy up the price of the premiums.

Every damn thing government touches turns to CRAP. Everything! Get the sumabeaches out of the unlawful involvement and let things take off.....

48 posted on 01/29/2002 5:44:14 PM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Go look for compassionate socialism someplace else....or at least have the guts to DEMAND your government change its Constitution to cover all this bullcrappie.
49 posted on 01/29/2002 5:45:46 PM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: willa
Congratulations on starting to see the light.

But, frankly, don't you think it is more important to set aside everything you have learned about him and his party, that what you thought was said really wasn't said; that what you thougt was written really wasn't written, and just concentrate on who looks cutest in a pair of tight fittin' jeans?

50 posted on 01/29/2002 5:55:54 PM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Any mechanism by which the consumers of a commodity do not bear 100% of its cost of production can only result in its increased scarcity.

Compassionate conservatism is neither.

51 posted on 01/29/2002 6:01:46 PM PST by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rowdee
You're talking about government mandates on private health care coverage. That is NOT what Pres. Bush is talking about, or what I am talking about. I'm referring to an enhanced safety net at a time when the number of uninsured is skyrocketing....a temporary expedient until the economy responds and begins to shrink that number of uninsured.
52 posted on 01/29/2002 7:03:59 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Answer me this: Just who are these "poor people" that you socialists keep yammering about? Then tell me what insurance they're not getting now that we all need to chip in for.
53 posted on 01/29/2002 8:32:23 PM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
"...a temporary expedient until the economy responds and begins to shrink that number of uninsured..."

Let me guess... your a sophmore, right? Not even the most wild eyed democrat believes in temporary entitlements.

54 posted on 01/29/2002 8:36:11 PM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I've got an idea! How about reducing eliminating the 20-25% that gets skimmed from every paycheck I make? I could afford to get insurance on my own then!

I know, I know, it'll never work. Got to keep the hogs at the trough so they know who the master is.

55 posted on 01/29/2002 9:07:35 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson