To: f.Christian
LOL! In the area of law he does not seem to know what he is talking about. However, as stated he does stir up a good conversation. Don't take him TOO seriously. As soon as faced with factual statements he often retreats into ad hominem attacks. A sure sign of inability to deal with the argument on a rational level. To put it another way-he is easily reduced to babbling and emmiting other inarticulate sounds. Any way I have to go God Go With You.
To: HENRYADAMS
LOL! In the area of law he does not seem to know what he is talking about. However, as stated he does stir up a good conversation. Don't take him TOO seriously. As soon as faced with factual statements he often retreats into ad hominem attacks. A sure sign of inability to deal with the argument on a rational level. To put it another way-he is easily reduced to babbling and emmiting other inarticulate sounds. Any way I have to go God Go With You. Oh please... you make the following statement:
It violates my Will(and the Will of the majority) Under modern theories of law "Will" is the basis of law see e.g. CC 22 "Law is an expression of will.
And then expect to be taken seriously?
Come on.
101 posted on
01/29/2002 7:51:55 AM PST by
OWK
To: HENRYADAMS
If you have an example of f.Christian doing something other than "babbling and emmiting [sic] other inarticulate sounds" I'd be very interested in a pointer to it.
412 posted on
01/31/2002 1:07:58 PM PST by
jejones
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson