Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLib
I enjoy reading William's articles, but I don't recall reading any on this topic. Do you have a link?
435 posted on 02/01/2002 6:57:57 AM PST by Spallenzani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies ]


To: Spallenzani
I can't find the exact one that I was looking for, but he touches on the essential points in this article.
Let's ask a general question just to get started. If there's an act we all agree is immoral and unacceptable when done by an individual, does that act become moral and acceptable when done collectively, namely by government?

You say, "Williams, that's a bit too esoteric; would you break it down?"

OK, here's a for-instance. If we deem rape as immoral and unacceptable when done by an individual, does rape become moral and acceptable when done collectively? What if we vote to rape someone. Does that make rape morally acceptable? I'm hoping that all of my fellow Americans will answer: Neither a majority consensus nor collective action necessarily establishes what's moral or immoral.

In the article that I read some time ago, he used this as an example of how you could never make rape acceptable, even if you passed a Constitutional Amendment saying it was. This also applies to theft, including theft by the Federal Government under the guise of income taxes.
451 posted on 02/01/2002 1:13:09 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson