No, this one doesn't but it isn't the first article that I've read about the case.
Despite how you say "it seems", the article says nothing about a "roommate."
I did more research on this. I found this article on-line. You're right that it doesn't mention "roommate" but I'm sure that I had read that elsewhere. No matter since I was making the point that the sodomy wasn't private and obviously someone else was present. Plus they left the stupid door open! Yeah, very reasonable expectation of privacy there, eh?
And I'll bet you can't find anything to support those allegations.
Pity I didn't confirm the amount you were putting up before forking over the proof!
The odd thing is that I've looked over a couple of articles on this case this morning and some say the guy who called in the false report served either 15 or 30 days for filing the false report. Well, which is it? 15 or 30? Why can't the media get even such basic details right?