 |
 |
Posted on 01/28/2002 4:35:20 PM PST by Notwithstanding
OSV Periodicals
|
|
1/13/2002 It’s tough to argue with Oprah. It’s not only hard, it almost seems downright rude. After all, Oprah Winfrey is a woman who has overcome difficult obstacles and achieved great success, mostly by offering her amiable, warm self up as an encouragement for others to lead meaningful lives and do good. Hard to argue, indeed, especially when you put Oprah in context — the context of early 21st-century American society — and compare the grounding of her success with how others at her level of celebrity and wealth have reached their own personal pinnacles.
She’s not Madonna, another super-wealthy American woman, enriched by exploiting sexuality. Her companies aren’t Wal-Mart or Nike, coffers stuffed by the fruit of destructive business practices and underpaid workers. Her entertainment products, from the magazine, O, to the made-for-television films to Oprah’s Book Club reflect a solid, albeit unchallenging, middlebrow quality that, unlike so much of what passes for entertainment out there today, doesn’t exploit the pull of our basest instincts just to turn a profit. Oprah moves forward in her life with energy and humor, refusing to give voice to any cant about oppression, discrimination or victimhood. As she frequently says, quoting words she heard Jesse Jackson say in a speech when she was a teenager: "Excellence is the best deterrent to racism. . . . Be excellent." Sure, it’s hard to argue with Oprah. But someone’s got to do it. So here goes. The argument isn’t with Oprah the talk-show host, Oprah the businesswoman, Oprah the philanthropist, Oprah the role model or Oprah the bookseller. It’s with Oprah the spiritual guru. ‘I am spirit’ Over the past decade, Oprah’s interest in issues like personal growth, healing and wholeness has taken on a decidedly "spiritual" gloss — which essentially means sprinkling words like "spirit" and "soul" into the self-help soup and working a segment called "Remembering your Spirit" into the television program. It also means featuring a succession of "spiritual counselors" on her program, most notably Marianne Williamson of "A Course in Miracles" fame, and at present, Gary Zukav, author of "Seat of the Soul" and "Soul Stories." Zukav is regularly featured on Oprah’s talk show and has a prominent spot on her website (www.oprah.com), where he offers obvious answers to reader questions in less-than-stirring prose: "The universe does not burden you with a destiny. It provides you with potential. How much of that potential you realize depends upon the choices that you make." Oprah articulated her personal beliefs in an interview with Zukav. Here’s what she has to say about herself: "My heart’s deepest desire is to live the truth of the life I came to live, and to live it to the fullest. To work with the Creator to do that. My heart’s deepest desire is to align the energy of my personality with that of my soul and become a whole, complete, glorious human here on earth. I think that I have done that, and I continue to do it as well as I know how." And, of course, Oprah wants to share her learned wisdom with the world as part of a forthcoming spiritual revolution: "I am talking about each individual having her or his own inner revolution. I am talking about each individual coming to the awareness that, ‘I am Creation’s son. I am Creation’s daughter. I am more than my physical self. I am more than this job that I do. I am more than the external definitions that I have given myself. . . . Those roles are all extensions of who I define myself to be, but ultimately I am Spirit come from the greatest Spirit. I am Spirit.’ " Perhaps nothing illuminated Oprah’s evolution into a spiritual leader more than her role presiding over the "Prayer for America" service on Sept. 23 at Yankee Stadium. There, Oprah said, among other words about healing: "I believe that when you lose a loved one you gain an angel whose name you know. Over 6,000, and counting, angels were added to the spiritual roster these past two weeks. It is my prayer that they will keep us in their sight with a direct line to our hearts. May we all leave this place and not let one single life have passed in vain. May we leave this place determined to now use every moment that we yet live to turn up the volume in our own lives, to create deeper meaning, to know what really matters. What really matters is who you love and how you love." Try to get from the first part of that paragraph to the last in a straight line of logic. Try to figure out where Oprah’s theology of angels come from. Try to see how any of it really relates to the hatred that fueled the Sept. 11 attacks. New Age hodgepodge So, in short, here’s what Oprah’s spirituality is about: a higher power, spirit, soul, "authentic power," meaning, healing, affirmation, helping, miracles, mediation, journaling and angels. An unremarkable New Age hodgepodge. Here’s what Oprah’s spirituality is not about: sin, redemption, sacrifice, conversion, humility, worship, holiness and Jesus Christ. Oprah’s spirituality is really little more than an expression, like everything else in the Oprah universe, of the Gestalt of Being Oprah: feeling good in the midst of a pleasant, yet conscience-tweaking materially successful life. Sure, the trappings of more traditional spirituality are draped over Oprah’s Way, and some of the language is even the same, but the more you look and listen to what’s being said, you see that the words don’t mean the same thing, and the practices aren’t for the same purposes. As you might expect, for example, Oprah’s Way encourages self-examination. But why? To root out sin? To bring one closer to God and more in God’s image? To grow in holiness? To find the answers to these questions, the most efficient point of inquiry is O, Oprah’s monthly magazine, launched in the spring of 2000 and startling all observers with its phenomenal instant success — perhaps the most successful magazine launch ever. Oprah graces every single cover of her magazine. Her words welcome the reader in an opening editorial and bade them farewell in a closing piece called "What I Know For Sure." Oprah conducts the featured interview with a fellow celebrity — this month Tom Hanks, next time the Dalai Lama. Every issue contains the "O List" — a collection of products that "Oprah really likes," things like $1,100 handbags and $1,500 watches: "When Quincy Jones gave this wild sunburst-orange watch to Oprah, she fell madly in love with it." And, of course, there’s the "spirituality." Each issue of O is organized around a "mission": truth, journey, friendship and so on. There’s a tear-out calendar with daily inspirational suggestions for following along the O mission. A reader can also tear out cards bearing inspirational sayings in various forms: This month, they’re printed on bookmarks; in November, they’re printed on place cards for a Thanksgiving dinner. There’s a photograph of a nature scene on a two-page spread, accompanied by a suggestion for an imaginative guided meditation on the scene. And sprinkled throughout the issues of O, you’ll find Oprah herself, once again, meditating here, doing yoga there, and enjoying a weekend "silent retreat" on her Indiana farm with a few friends and meals prepared by her personal chef. Celebrity spirituality So it seems that Oprah’s Way of spirituality and self-examination, whether it be via meditation or journaling, is about none of the pesky "negative" themes of traditional Christian spirituality. It’s all about rooting out obstacles to empowerment and success and feeling good about it. Not quite "The Story of Soul." Not quite. But, you see, that’s what happens when a wealthy celebrity crafts a spirituality. The purpose of the spiritual practices becomes completely different than those of a young cloistered nun in a Carmelite convent in France. The sister is intent on God, because there is really nothing else at stake. The wealthy celebrity has much at stake. She has her popularity, which might be threatened if she embraced anything but the broadest, most inclusive spiritual program imaginable. She has her wealth, which must be justified and perpetuated. She has her cultivated audience, which will accept nothing but positive vibes and empowerment. She has a staff and servants, so growth toward God via sacrifice and humility will not be on her Daytimer. Oprah’s Way, like all New Age paradigms, may work for a while, but it ultimately fails, because it only takes in a small part of the reality of human experience, and completely ignores that most unpleasant, yet persistent reality called sin — which is something more than an impediment to personal empowerment. — Welborn (awelborn@osv.com) writes from Indiana What can the Church learn from Oprah? During the summer of 2001, Oprah led workshops in several cities called "Live Your Best Life," charging participants $185 for a day of listening to her motivational speaking and then doing some journaling exercises and guided meditation with her and self-help writer Cheryl Richardson. Most of the workshops sold out within an hour. What Catholic spiritual leader, short of the pope himself, could sell out auditoriums at $185 a pop? What Catholic spiritual leader could fill an auditorium with women seeking inspiration and leadership for free? The enthusiasm that Oprah inspires is worth pondering. Some of it’s obviously tied to materialist values: At some level, many look at Oprah and want to be like her, not because she professes happiness or gives loads of money to charity, but because she’s rich and has a bunch of houses and can get anything she wants. But there is, we must admit, something else as well. Lots of people do, indeed, feel terrible about themselves and are deeply unhappy. They’re burdened by guilt; they’re carrying the weight of past hurts. They feel estranged from others, from God, from themselves. As inadequate as the solutions she proposes are, Oprah is enormously influential because she is committed to helping people deal with those kind of problems. Listen to a typical Catholic homily. Study a typical adult religious-education program. Do they address any of these practical concerns that hit people where they live and love? Perhaps they do, but maybe not nearly enough. Maybe it wouldn’t hurt us to take a page from Oprah’s book — not the page that misdefines "spirit" and toys with reincarnation, but rather the page that’s warm, helpful and intent on helping others "live your best life," and then rewrite that page — with Christ, not Oprah, as the light for living that very best life. » A.W. Treasuring the ‘inner me’ In a recent interview with "spiritual counselor" Gary Zukav, Oprah Winfrey offered a self-evaluation: Zukav: Do you like yourself? Oprah: I don’t just like me. I adore me. Zukav: What do you adore the most? Oprah: I adore my groundedness. I adore my ability to listen to other people. I adore particularly my ability to listen to what I call my intuition, my Voice. My life is bigger than me. I have just gotten to the point where I can look at my body and my face and appreciate them and say, "Yes, I like these little lines in my face, and I like the fact that my nose is as flat as it is. I don’t want anybody else’s face." But the inner me, I treasure. I also adore that I feel a connection to other people that really makes me feel like a part of something that is bigger than myself. I feel a connection and a oneness with other people. That is why I cannot stop myself from crying on the show sometimes, because I am there, I am in there, I am feeling it, feeling everything they are feeling. And I adore that I have a great generous spirit. That’s the best thing about me. Everything that I get, gets better when I share it and I know it does. The moon over the water the other night was glorious. It lit the whole ocean. I called everybody. "You gotta see the moon. Have you seen the moon? Go out right now and look at it." Last week I found some slippers that felt wonderful, so I bought them for all the women in the control room at the studio. » A.W.
Subscribe to Our Sunday Visitor
|
Send comments regarding this site to webmaster@osv.com
Copyright © 1998-2002, Our Sunday Visitor. All rights reserved.
The author nails it when she says that Oprah must embrace the broadest possible "spirituality" (my paraphrase) in order to keep her audience. It's the old "try to please everyone, everywhere" game. Most people with even a modicum of intelligence see right through that.
I don't discount the importance of adopted family, but the key word is "adopted." I reject the increasingly popular idea that the word "family" should be redefined as any collection of people that gather around you, regardless of kinship, affection or loyalty.
IMHO, no matter how much you love your pets or how precious they are to you, they aren't family. I wasn't commenting on some sort of deficiency that Oprah has because she's single and childless -- I wanted to make the point that she is so ego-bound to grace every cover of her mag that her spending Christmas with her pets was all but equated with spending it with flesh-and-blood relatives.
From your statement I get the feeling that anyone who does not fit your narrow view are somehow subhuman and have no idea as to the spirit of Christmas.
I certainly don't feel that dogs have any idea.
Back in 1995, I was reading Newsweek online. Apparently the week before they had reviewed the movie, REALITY BITES, with Winona Rider. The movie was about the trials and tribulations of Generation X and I guess the reviewer didn't like it and bashed the generation as a whole. A young man wrote a letter to the editor which basically said that Baby Boomers (like myself) had no idea who hard it was to be a Baby Buster (Gen x). We had ruined life for them and .. well.. you know the usual liberal crap.
In those days, they would give the writers' email address. Bored, I wrote him a note and told him that it was his job, as the younger generation, to tell me how we screwed everything up. But it was my job to tell him what a spoiled, rotten little punk he was and if he didn't like the way things were, to go out and try to change them. But quit whining.
From there we started an online "dialog" which turned from nasty to nice and I ended up admitting that I thought my generation had failed his generation because we have not taught them how to access all the opportunities out there and I would help him in any way I could.
Now, apparently, Oprah's people had read his letter to the editor too, and contacted him. They wanted to do a show about Baby Boomers vs. Baby Busters. What they would do is take the entire audience that day to see the movie, Reality Bites, and then they would have a panel of Boomers and Busters who would stake their positions. They wanted to do the show around his letter. They asked him if he knew anyone who had an opposing viewpoint. He said, well, there's this crazy girl who I've been emailing. Oprah's people told him to contact me and tell me to call their office.
He contacted me on a Sunday night. I called them Monday morning, and they flew me out to Chicago on Wednesday evening. I told the producers about someone else who shared my viewpoint and they flew him out from Colorado.
They flew me out Business Class, a limousine picked me up and took me to a great hotel. They did the same for my friend. We had dinner at the hotel, and in the morning, a car came and took us the studio. That was a trip.
Oprah filmed three shows a day, so when you're in the green room, you're watching another show. The show before ours was a show about really obese kids. Oprah was crying and it was horrifying. I was worried that it would effect our show. But of course, she was a true professional and all tears were put aside.
I think in 1995, Oprah was her skinniest. I mean, she was tiny. She wore this beautiful pants suit and just looked terrific. They sat you down on stage and wired you up. She came over and made sure she knew how to pronounce your name and all. She was very nice. I commented that I liked her outfit, and she came over and started engaging me in conversation. Very natural.
The show was hysterical. They started by reading the kid's letter saying how horrible us "old" people were (remember, I was 36 at the time). The first person she called to respond was ME! I gave him an earful about how he should quit whining and do something with his life. It got alot of applause. It wasn't a Springer, confrontational kind of show, it was just fun.
After the show, the limousine whisked us back to the airport and off I went. It was a really fabulous experience. We watch the tape from time to time. It actually aired on my birthday, April 22nd and we had a big party.
I guess that's it. But my personal memories of Oprah were great. Plus, Steadman was there and he is so good looking!
BTW, we are about the same age.
I saw Steadman on America's Voice, a conservative cable network that may or may not still be in business, a few years ago. He was awesome. Very calm and polite. Very logical and definitely not spouting liberal garb. I was so impressed. And, yes, he's quite good-looking so I imagine he's even better looking in person. I loved his personality.
I do not get the venom for Oprah. I think it's rude. Now, someone like Rosie who is "in your face" with her political views I can understand but, Oprah?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.